Talk:Boulders (album)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by JB525 in topic Side names

Fair use rationale for Image:Boulders .jpg edit

 

Image:Boulders .jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Side names edit

@JB525:, thanks for your contributions. I see you changed the side headings from 'Side one'/'two' to 'Side 1'/'2'. I know that's how they're written on the original vinyl but it doesn't quite look right to me, and I've just consulted several Featured Articles to see if 'Side 1'/2' is the norm for albums that originally used numerals on the sleeve and it isn't the case. Is this a policy somewhere? Or else I will revert to the English spellings.--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 17:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

@TangoTizerWolfstone: I only changed it for consistency (from 'Side one'/'2'). I didn't see guidance as to which was preferred so I went with what was on the sleeve. I have no objection to replacing the numerals with words. --JB525 (talk) 23:12, 24 December 2020 (UTC)Reply