Talk:Bordertown (2007 film)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bordertown (2007 film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image Bordertown.jpg 2/6/07
editSorry, I removed this image. OrphanBot has tagged image for deletion due to no sourcing. (Also no fair use rationale was stated.) I'm sure we'll use this image in the near future, but please do your homework before uploading and placing images in articles.
Also, images should not be placed "willi-nilly" at any place one sees fit. Where it was placed was, well... Edits such as these will be reversed ASAP. Luigibob 13:27, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
2006 or 2007 film?
editIs the title of this article, "Bordertown (2006 film)", correct? The article doesn't note any release dates in 2006. It appears that the Feb 2007 showing at the Berlin Film Festival was its premiere, unless the article isn't accurate. Should the article be moved to "Bordertown (2007 film)"?--Ataricodfish 02:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- The article is correct, it's just that IMDb has it as 2006. I believe that's why someone listed it as such originally. I agree. I do that ASAP. Thanks for pointing that out! ;-) Luigibob 06:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Already released
editAccording to [1] the film is already released in several European countries (at least in DVD). I have seen it myself on DVD in Norway. So it seems like the 28th September release date is too late. 152.94.19.123 16:18, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Clarification
editThis sentence does not make sense to me:
"The picture was first presented at the Berlin International Film Festival on February 15, 2007 in competition where it opened to mixed reactions from the attending crowd, some feeling anger after seeing a scene where rape was involved cried."
Could the person who wrote it please make it more clear? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.2.175.134 (talk) 12:00, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
It's the most annoying film I've seen lately
editAuthors used the tragedy in Juarez to sell their political views in a ridiculously demagogic way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.131.137.50 (talk) 20:13, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
True Story
editThe homicide rate is high in Juarez overall. There is no reason to believe that the homicides of women are all part of a serial killing. I've tried to removed the text that suggests this.--Jack Upland (talk) 05:47, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
That isn't quite true. The overall homicide rate is high, you are right in that, but there is reason to believe that a number of these murders are serial murders. None of the reports say that they are all the work of one serial killer but even the Mexican government thought and thinks that serial murder plays a part. Abdul Latif Sharif, a known serial killer, was convicted of some of these murders and accused of ordering more from jail. Despite his arrest, the serial-styled murders continue. For over 2 decades women in Juarez and other border towns have been targeted by murderers. Many of the women share physical characteristics. Young, slender, long, dark hair, large eyes, etc. Many are targeted from the same locations. Many of this group were tied in the same way, raped, tortured, mutilated, killed, and their bodies were dumped in specific places. There's no doubt at all serial murder is happening, or that the law enforcement in Mexico isn't doing nearly enough to stop it.
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/1999-08-22/news/9908220018_1_sharif-juarez-young-women
https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/104000/amr410272003en.pdf
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bordertown (2006 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070220222902/http://www.abqtrib.com:80/news/2006/oct/19/nms-bordertown-hits-snag-loans/ to http://www.abqtrib.com/news/2006/oct/19/nms-bordertown-hits-snag-loans/
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://mdn.mainichi-msn.co.jp/entertainment/news/20070203p2a00m0et015000c.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070218075042/http://today.reuters.com:80/news/articlenews.aspx?type=reviewsNews&storyID=2007-02-16T005614Z_01_N15239824_RTRIDST_0_REVIEW-FILM-BORDERTOWN-DC.XML to http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=reviewsNews&storyID=2007-02-16T005614Z_01_N15239824_RTRIDST_0_REVIEW-FILM-BORDERTOWN-DC.XML
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bordertown (2006 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927192506/http://www.thewest.com.au/aapstory.aspx?StoryName=352887 to http://www.thewest.com.au/aapstory.aspx?StoryName=352887
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Film release year wrong
editBoth IMDb and Rottentomatoes give 2007 as release year. Title should be fixed I think. Aquatic Ambiance (talk) 14:28, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- I have moved it from Bordertown (2006 film) to Bordertown (2007 film) and posted to Wikipedia:Help desk#Film release year wrong (permanent link). PrimeHunter (talk) 19:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)