Talk:Blood rule

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

This Line Baffles Me edit

somehow gets a bleeding and/or non-bleeding open wound, is bleeding in any way, shape, or form, or who has blood on them or their clothes, Is this a confusing phrase that needs to be fixed or am I not understanding it correctly? -WarthogDemon 21:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Maybe I can think of a better way to put it in the article, but basically any wound whether it includes any open wound, whether bleeding or not, if the player is bleeding in any way for some reason, including nose bleeds and the such that may not be related to injuries or wounds, or has any blood on their clothes either from themselves or other people. If you can think of a better way to put it in the article, please do so. I'm trying to think of a way right now, but I haven't come up with anything. BsroiaadnTalk 21:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Leagues that have a blood rule edit

After looking through the National Football League 2011 Rule Book, I couldn't find any "blood rule" so I removed the NFL from the list. Scott.Ibbotson (talk) 03:20, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blood rule. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 22 July 2017 (UTC)Reply