Talk:Blitum bonus-henricus

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 21:50, 3 July 2008 (UTC) I was told that this plant contains oxalic acid. I assume that is the leaves. Oxalic acid is in Rhubarb leaves and considered inedible. Rabbits won't eat it. Could somebody please provide a scientific paragraph about Goosefoot's chemical content and whether any part of the plant should not be eaten? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MariannePietersen (talk • contribs) 17:09, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Article name

Why does this article take its title from the plant's Latin name? Shouldn't the article be called Good King Henry? Grant (talk) 11:34, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

It's more neutral placed at the scientific name and is in line with the flora naming convention. --Rkitko ^(talk) 01:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

The naming convention says the scientific name should be used "except when a plant has an agricultural, horticultural, economic or cultural use that makes it more prominent in some other field than in botany." Surely that's the case here? Leave aside that the Latin name basically means Good King Henry, which implies the scientific classification came later. Madgenberyl (talk) 13:24, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blitum bonus-henricus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6VqJ46atN?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bsbi.org.uk%2FBSBIList2007.xls to http://www.bsbi.org.uk/BSBIList2007.xls
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ars-grin.gov/~sbmljw/cgi-bin/taxon.pl?466043

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:17, 4 November 2016 (UTC)