Bishopcroft is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
A fact from Bishopcroft appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 April 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The article says, "Bishopcroft remained an episcopal residence until it was sold in 1939. It was entered into the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) in 2000." That's a gap of 60 years! (Not to mention that another 22-23 years have passed since then.) What happened to the house in that time? How was it used? Were there additions or remodelings? -- Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 14:15, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
That guess is essentially correct. There was some material buried within some sources, but the content was vague and sometimes contradictory. Because sustained coverage hasn't provided clarity, content on the gap period is excluded. Additional sourcing supposedly exists, but I don't have access to it. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply