Talk:Biryu

Descendant of biryu

I could not find any explanation about the offspring of biryu in samguk sagi. This sentence may be original research, and will be removed unless one reply to this comment. --Hairwizard91 14:11, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

I assume you mean the statement that his descendants retained enough power for the alternate version to be recorded in the Samguk Sagi? That is directly supported by the cited source [1] ... although that does say "until late Baekje" so the passage should probably be changed. -- Visviva 14:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Chapter & verse

I'm away from my books and am obliged to rely on the Empas online edition of the Samguk Sagi, where the search function is nearly useless... Can someone please point me to the specific passage where this "alternative version" of Baekje's founding is mentioned? -- Visviva 14:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Michuhol

There are several theories about the location of Michuhol. It cannot be explained affirmatively.

Wiryeseong

There are actually two Wiryeseong; one is habuk(North of river) wiryeseong and the other is hanam (south of river)wiryeseong. It is so sure that the hanam wiryeoseong is near the seoul but there are several theories about the habuk wiryeoseong. It should be clarified in the article. --Hairwizard91 14:58, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

As you can see from these two Korean encyclopedias, [2] [3] Onjo settled in Hanam, not Habuk, Wiryeseong. Please do not delete references to reputable encyclopedias. Please check your source again, and feel free to add citations to contrary views, but don't delete citations to the mainstream view. Please. Thanks. Goguryeo 17:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Biryu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://100.nate.com/EnSrch.asp?kid=14338400
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070410134114/http://enc.daum.net:80/dic100/viewContents.do? to http://enc.daum.net/dic100/viewContents.do?&m=all&articleID=b10b3024a
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070410134114/http://enc.daum.net:80/dic100/viewContents.do? to http://enc.daum.net/dic100/viewContents.do?&m=all&articleID=b10b3024a
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070410134114/http://enc.daum.net:80/dic100/viewContents.do? to http://enc.daum.net/dic100/viewContents.do?&m=all&articleID=b10b3024a

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)