Talk:Beorn

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Beorn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GimliDotNet (talk · contribs) 12:44, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

I am going to do my first review of a GA nominated article. Feel free to ping me any advice on my talk page or in a new section below. It may take a few days for me to work my way through it as I go through the guidance and content of the article.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

The sentence

Beorn's human form is of such great size that the three and a half foot tall Bilbo judge that he could have easily walked between Beorn's legs without touching his body

Needs adjusting, the “judge” Is not right, it should be judges.

• Fixed.

1. b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

This article qualifies for GA status, it meets all the above criteria and then some. User:Chiswick Chap has taken a weak article, expanded it with relevant information. (Criteria marked are unassessed)