Talk:Ben Breedlove

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

In favor to keep article

edit
Discussion as to whether the article should be deleted belongs on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Breedlove, not here on the article's talk page. Please read WP:AFDFORMAT before contributing. --Davejohnsan (talk) 18:13, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Keep it. He was an inspiration with he video that he recently posted about his heart problems and what happened when he fainted. If you must know what they are about, got to Youtube and look him up. Please do not delete him, he really is someone who should have a page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.242.176.88 (talk) 05:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

It is taking popularity, even in other languages. I don't see reasons to delete it. --175.100.80.136 (talk) 05:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

KEEP. I did not come here because some website asked me to. I live in the Rocky Mountain west and do not know the Breedlove family or anyone associated with them. I came to Wikipedia to learn more about Ben Breedlove. Any teenager who can accomplish as much PUBLICLY in his or her short life as Ben Breedlove did should be given the same consideration and acknowledgement as an adult who accomplishes something publicly significant. If personalities such as the Kardashian family, who are famous only for being famous, can meet the criteria for admission to Wikipedia, then a teenage boy who produced scores of videos with a large public following, and who's last video entry has rivited and inspired literally millions of people around the globe with his courage and perspective should certainly qualify. bconnerjr — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bconnerjr (talkcontribs) 08:57, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply


Keep it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.251.186.35 (talk) 10:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please Note - All further thoughts on the matter, should be shared here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Breedlove. -- MSTR (Merry Christmas!) 12:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

NBC accused of editing out Religion part of Breedlove's video in broadcast

edit

How would I add this to the article - how would I word it? Would somebody please be able to assist? thanks. The source:

Note There's a second source, however it's been blocked from Spam Filter. (See:[1])

-- MSTR (Merry Christmas!) 07:32, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

There's not much discussion of religion in THIS article either... --75.73.51.113 (talk) 21:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

PEOPLE Magazine Online has posted an article on Ben

edit

[http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20557271,00.html Teen Died on Christmas, Left Behind Candid Message on YouTube BY HOWARD BREUER

Thursday December 29, 2011 11:00 AM EST] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.113.59.218 (talk) 17:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Editing the number of Video Views

edit

What is the proper way to add in that Ben's video has 5,237,000 + views? thank youPetersontinam (talk) 01:41, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

When is the deletion discussion closed?

edit

When is this closed and how long, on average, does a decision take for a proposed deletion? ThanksPetersontinam (talk) 20:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

It has been closed as no consensus. PROD would be a waste of time, additionally. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 09:15, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I think Petersontinam confused a proposed deletion (which this was not) with a Article for Discusssion (AfD) process, which in this case (as you say) has just been closed, with a ruling of "no consensus" for deletion at this time. If the AfD is what was meant, they normally are kept open ten days for full input. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:44, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

ABC vs. People.com Article (Information)

edit

Well,

On ABC it seems as if their story of bens Death is totally different the the one from People.com ( which was a interview from one of Bens Friends.... When everything Happened)

On the wikipedia article it says ben died while eating christmas dinner but,

On People.com on an article it says:

On Christmas Day Ben got a video camera and wanted to test it out. He went outside and started feeling out of breath and lightheaded so he came inside, laid down and just passed out again and never came back." Breedlove's parents called 911 after they saw him pass out but efforts to revive him failed.


So the question is: Should I replace the information from ABC with that from people.com? It seems to me as the people.com one is more accurate because it was obtained from Bens friend during an interview.....

Please discuss as it can only improve the article itself :)

--Dombroski661 (talk) 08:03, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, Dombroski :) ~ Here are the two articles that need to be examined - and decided which one to side with:
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ben Breedlove. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Ben Breedlove. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:31, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ben Breedlove. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ben Breedlove. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply