Talk:Battle of Rottofreddo

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / French / Early Modern Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

-Battle Result-

According to the named source (http://www.zum.de/whkmla/region/italy/piemabs.html), it was an Austrian victory. This was als written in the German wikipedia article about the Italian campaign during the WoAS, and i also found the same conclusion about the battle in following source: "The modern part of An universal history, from the earliest accounts ..., Band 37" (https://books.google.at/books?id=MisIAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA312&lpg=PA312&dq=Battle+of+Rottofreddo++1746&source=bl&ots=4vNHWo0obA&sig=IgdJ6Biabi4Y-Ai2hLIT0UeKhWw&hl=de&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwifwcOop_rRAhWJExoKHc5yBcg4ChDoAQg_MAc#v=onepage&q=Battle%20of%20Rottofreddo%20%201746&f=false) PNM (6.2.2017) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.109.89.105 (talk) 01:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic