This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Zoupan, I think your proposal should be backed by some arguments. For the time being, I do not understand it. Banat is a clear geographical region with its specific history. Why should we describe its history or its medieval history in an article dedicated to the geographical region itself. Should we also merge the article Kingdom of Hungary (1000-1301) merge into the article Hungary? Borsoka (talk) 09:17, 9 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Actually, I meant to propose the merge to a new article, History of Banat, which redirects to Banat. You can remove the tag.--Zoupan 09:31, 9 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
It must be mentioned that the medieval "Temeskoz" was never part of any banate in the Hungarian kingdom (the modern name of the territory "Banat" was only born in the 18th century). Fakirbakir (talk) 10:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
And what about the Banat of Temeswar after which the region is now known as Banat? :) Yes, Banat is a 18th-century name, such as the names of the Carpathian Basin, Central Europe and hundreds of geographical names. Borsoka (talk) 14:59, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
I meant Temeskoz was not a banate at all but an integral part of the medieval kingdom. Fakirbakir (talk) 16:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
