This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caves, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of caving and cave articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CavesWikipedia:WikiProject CavesTemplate:WikiProject CavesCaves articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
A fact from Baishiya Karst Cave appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 June 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I tried to wikilink this, but it's a dab and as I wasn't sure which to select, I thought it would be better to intentionally link the dab so others would take a look. --valereee (talk) 11:08, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion
@Fraenir: Thanks for creating the article! Before its newfound fame as an palaeoanthpological site, the Baishiya cave was mainly known as a Tibetan Buddhist site and a local tourist attraction. I think there is enough material for Xiahe mandible to be a standalone article, and the cave article can be expanded with other content unrelated to the fossil. I've found some Chinese sources about the cave. What are your thoughts? -Zanhe (talk) 00:35, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Zanhe, I was thinking the same thing...that the mandible is likely notable enough. I've emailed Zhang to ask if she'll upload some of her photos of both the mandible and the cave. No response, but I'm sure she's gotten a lot of email in the last couple days! It might not be a bad idea to ask in Chinese, too, if you'd want to do that? She's clearly fluent in English, but a request in her own language might not seem as weird. --valereee (talk) 09:31, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Sure, go ahead. I have no problems with splitting the mandible into its own article. It looks like they've only started serious research at the cave recently, so I expect more information will be forthcoming in the future, so perhaps they might find some other interesting stuff there as well.Fraenir (talk) 13:13, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Fraenir and Valereee: I've completed the split and expanded the articles a bit, please take a look. I've also nominated the articles for ITN as it's a significant scientific discovery. See nomination page. -Zanhe (talk) 09:11, 4 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Zanhe, got there too late to comment, it had already been posted. I'm thinking maybe we could do a three-way nom for DYK? I'd love to have it get the image spot! Has anyone found a free-use image of that mandible? --valereee (talk) 12:31, 4 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Since Xiahe mandible is already featured as a blurb on ITN, which gets far more attention, it's no longer eligible for DYK. Baishiya Karst Cave is still eligible, and I'm working on the other scientist Chen Fahu. I normally nominate scientists separately from their contributions, because from my experience, when they're featured in the same DYK, readers tend to focus their attention on the findings and ignore the scientist articles. -Zanhe (talk) 22:36, 4 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Valereee and Fraenir: Well, I was too lazy to come up with two interesting hooks, so I went ahead and bundled the remaining three articles together in a single nomination. Please see nomination page and feel free to suggest alternative hooks there. -Zanhe (talk) 00:33, 6 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
