Talk:Bad Dragon

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bad Dragon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 22 July 2015 by reviewer Sulfurboy (talk · contribs).

Furry Low‑importance

	Bad Dragon is within the scope of WikiProject Furry, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to furry fandom. For more information, visit the project page.FurryWikipedia:WikiProject FurryTemplate:WikiProject Furryfurry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Imageboard#Danbooru-style boards|booru]] The anchor (#Danbooru-style boards) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Neutral Point of View edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I really don't think this article is Neutral Point of View compared to other articles featuring business in the adult industry, such as Pornhub, XVideos, and XHamster. While the sources given are valid, most of it reads like a giant advertisement rather than something purely factual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClosetBurger (talk • contribs) 00:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. Purely promotional. AndyTheGrump (talk) 04:55, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

I've had a go at cleaning up the language used on the page; thoughts? -- Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 16:22, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Better. I've just removed a load of primary-sourced promotional waffle re COVID-19 too, since it amounted to 'we will carry on selling stuff' too.

I think the article would be better if the 'products' section didn't read quite so much like a catalogue, with more third-party commentary, and less citation of third-party sources just so the article can list such objects. That really requires more research though, and quite frankly, I've go better things to do with my time than look for wolf-dildo reviews or whatever. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic