Talk:Atticus Ross

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Dorglorg in topic Image

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Atticus Ross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Image edit

I image searched and found this photo at 30 seconds: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BO2q3aHT0bQ I know it's a weird source but you very clearly see the original image fitting more naturally than the one you added (it's also the only other online origin of this specific image). Now I'm going to remove it from the article again and if you know how to nominate it's deletion, you can. Dorglorg (talk) 06:03, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Dorglorg: It is really amazing and unbelievable that you think that shit video provides "the original image" and it is "fitting more naturally than the one you added"!! that junk and bullshit video was uploaded in "Mar 13, 2009" while this image:   was uploaded in "05:46, 2007 January 11" !! that's means older than 2 years! and uploaded by an user named User:Rob sheridan (see Rob sheridan); apart from the date, it is clearly visible that all the images in that shit video are modified/photoshoped!--Editor-1 (talk) 07:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Amazing detective work here. Also definitely nothing suspicious about "Rob sheridan" user with his only edit. I can't tell of Editor-1 (talk · contribs) is being serious, or is it an April fools joke gone too far. How's this for a source then? Look for Replacement Player picture, dated Dec 05. Clearly also photoshopped, in case you can't tell. --BlameRuiner (talk) 21:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

To editors Dorglorg and BlameRuiner: I didn't want to use tineye.com or http://images.google.com to search the image, because I had no doubt about it, the image has Exif metadata, and it shows:

Software used | Adobe Photoshop CS Macintosh
File change date and time | 15:28, 20 July 2004
Date and time of digitizing | 09:57, 20 July 2004
Date metadata was last modified | 10:28, 20 July 2004

the upload date was "11 January 2007" but its metadata shows it dates at least "20 July 2004" which is older than "ReplacementPlayer.jpg | 2005-12-12" that you have linked, and I don't see any reason that its metadata is fake! also it was modified using "Adobe Photoshop CS Macintosh", everyone that know NIN knows that all of them use Mac for everything; about c:User:Rob sheridan, this guy has only one edit that was in "11 January 2007", in those days Rob sheridan was so much less known than these days and I don't get why someone at that time created a fake account and uploaded a fake image without even adding it to this article or other articles.

In anyway, I think the only and best solution to solve this problem is asking Rob sheridan and Atticus Ross about this image! to know that it is fake or not, and if it is fake it should be completely deleted not only removed from this article, unfortunately I don't have any social media account so I can't ask them, but anyone who has interest and a social media account should do it and provide the question-answer link, thanks.--Editor-1 (talk) 04:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Please don't tag me in any more of this garbage.--Dorglorg (talk) 04:16, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply