Talk:Ashe (Overwatch)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ashe (Overwatch)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 09:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Lead

1. Should clarify details about the Deadlock gang in the body of the article - particularly mentioning that it was formed as an arms-dealing gang and that it's based out of Arizona.
   1. Fixed. Removed the Arizona bit too, it didn't add anything.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:40, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Concept and development

1. Is Blizzplanet an appropriate source?
   1. It's had direct dealing with Blizzard Entertainment in the past, and I also linked to a recording of the panel itself on Web Archive for each citation.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:23, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Design

1. "Two notable skins include "Mobster" and "Safari"" Is this a pair of skins, or just skins for Ashe that have an accompanying B.O.B. costume?
   1. Fixed I think?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:26, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Aight, all done. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC)