Talk:Arbetarbladet
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 1 April 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Is this tiny Swedish newspaper even worth mentioning in an international encyklopedia? As a reader, I can say that the paper itself mostly contains very local news, and is only published to a few thousand people in the Gävle-area. 85.225.27.124 19:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Arbetarbladet has a circulation of around 30 000 and has around 70 000 daily readers according to the statistics of 2001. The numbers of today are more or less the same. /130.240.199.83 16:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Arbetarbladet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080430172852/http://www.tt-magasinet.se:80/ttmag.php?region=sth to http://www.tt-magasinet.se/ttmag.php?region=sth&bibliotekId=06&titelId=1939
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725040448/http://tidning.kb.se/nld/ny/tidning_all.asp?tidnid=15 to http://tidning.kb.se/nld/ny/tidning_all.asp?tidnid=15
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 17 October 2016 (UTC)