Talk:Anitra Steen

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Themoodyblue in topic Bias of entry

Party cost and financing of it edit

I removed the following text.

She also sponsored a single party for staff which cost taxpayers over $1.6 million [citation needed] 
- this while her company has been forced to fire people because of their bad finances.

It is a fact that the income for Systembolaget is a percentage on the sales, like any shop chain, not any tax payer support. Therefore the text is misleading. What the party costed is another thing, but I think that they are allowed to have internal parties at least once a year like most companies. -- 81.230.74.191 14:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Bias of entry edit

I am concerned that the tone of this contribution seems to assume that Ms. Steen is guilty of everything the poster has written about. This piece needs to be balanced and there needs to be an assumption of innocence. She has not been convicted, nor even formally accused, of any wrongdoing in regard to the Systembolaget scandal. It sounds a bit like the author is taking some swings at former Prime Minister Persson by making unfounded assumptions and implications about his spouse. The Moody Blue (talk) 02:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)Reply