Talk:Andrea Bertozzi

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andrea Bertozzi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121018165611/http://www.siam.org/visiting/speakers/bertozzi.php to http://www.siam.org/visiting/speakers/bertozzi.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem

This article has been tagged as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) It will likely be deleted after one week unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Major contributions by contributors who have been verified to have violated copyright in multiple articles may be presumptively deleted in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations.

Interested contributors are invited to help clarify the copyright status of this material or rewrite the article in original language at the temporary page linked from the article's face. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. --MER-C 16:15, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

@MER-C: the only significant level of copying Earwig found (34%) was from a 2019 web page; this article itself is from 2012. And the copying was mostly of names of awards and institutions, not problematic. You should only be tagging articles as likely copyvio when you have a specific target that you think it was copied from. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

You cannot assume that no detection of a copyvio on Earwig == no copyvio. There are potential copyvio sources that Earwig doesn't reach. Websites that don't appear in search indices. Dead websites. Books. Translations. I've seen them all. The policy on copyright violations states I do not need a source - the conditions for the assumption that all major contributions of Dante8 are copyvios are met. MER-C 19:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

The conditions for listing the article in the CCI page and launching an investigation are met. The conditions for blanking the article and declaring that it will be imminently deleted are not met. The standard you implicitly put forward here, that absence of evidence is not good enough and that we have to provide evidence that no copyvio exists, is impossible to meet and therefore nonsensical. And given that the article is more or less a bare listing of titles and accomplishments, without evaluative or creative prose describing it, it is hard to see how any of it could be copyrightable. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:57, 19 April 2020 (UTC)