Talk:Alice Bentinck
 | A fact from Alice Bentinck appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 October 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Removed cleanup tag edit
This is a silly reason for a cleanup tag. The article has 19 citations. It was largely written by a single user as it was a new article launched for the WP:Women in Red project's Women in Leadership editathon. If you would like to contribute more to the article, please do so. Yoninah (talk) 20:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Oh dear, that escalated quickly. We seem to be at cross-purposes. I couldn't find a better template to indicate to readers that so much of this article has come from one editor (which I can see is yourself). I know that is absolutely fine, it's just that as most of Wikipedia comes from collaborative writing, I thought this article is a bit atypical. Also I was troubled by the lack of inbound links, but if she is notable presumably there will be more. By the way 64 minutes is a bit quick to delete the tag. I'd watched this page with a view to coming back to see how I could contribute to the page. I'm literally in my lunch hour two days later to have a look at my watched pages. And by the way, I know you're a very experienced editor which is why I'm a bit surprised that you've let me know I can edit the article! Seaweed (talk) 11:56, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alice Bentinck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150925193629/http://www.inspiringfifty.com/50-inspiring-women-list-2015-eu/ to http://www.inspiringfifty.com/50-inspiring-women-list-2015-eu/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:28, 1 July 2017 (UTC)