Talk:Alcatel Mobile

Latest comment: 13 days ago by 190.173.116.156 in topic Comments

Comments edit

This article seems slightly biased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.115.221.105 (talk) 13:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Biased, copypasted, incomplete. Not much information on this company anyway, but it could be better. 123.176.119.19 (talk) 06:57, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

The homepage is actually not accessible. It's timing out Flowright138 (talk) 11:18, 12 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

@ 190.173.116.156 (talk) 03:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Move? (11 March 2015) edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) -- Calidum 03:21, 20 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


We also need to take the WP:MOSTM and WP:ALLCAPS into account.--64.229.166.35 (talk) 19:40, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Historical Alcatel mobile telephones edit

Alcatel has been making mobile telephones for quite some time now prior to this joint venture, but there doesn't seem to be a page on it, is that due to notability or does it have another reason? --Lumia930uploader (talk) 09:06, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Alcatel is now the new name of Alcatel Mobile Phones edit

Alcatel mobile phone should redirect here. But I propose to create a new Alcatel page for the historic french company before it merged with Lucent to form Alcatel-Lucent (now Nokia).--Xaviateur (talk) 06:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Alcatel Watch edit

There is a red hyperlink for Alcatel Watch. I don't think it is a noteworthy product to have a (currently non-existent) article for it. Could this red hyperlink be removed from the article please? 86.22.34.211 (talk) 20:07, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply