This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cuba, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cuba related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CubaWikipedia:WikiProject CubaTemplate:WikiProject CubaCuba articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
It seems that there were two crashes of Aerograviota An-26s. One a civil flight and one a military flight, in adjoining provinces. This article could be expanded to cover both, once more details are known. Mjroots (talk) 21:43, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
Now clear that is was a military fight. Artemisa Province was created from Pinar del Rio Province, which is where the confusion arose. Mjroots (talk) 05:30, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose – The only source giving the flight number is the ASN [2], which doesn't quote any source containing that detail and is known sometimes for making up flight numbers from call signs or tail numbers. Until better sources are available (e.g. the official accident report), it's more prudent to keep the current title. --Deeday-UK (talk) 09:46, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. The WikiProject page cited as standard procedure has no standing as a naming convention, so there is no valid rationale for this proposed move. Andrewa (talk) 15:35, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
@Deeday-UK:@Andrewa: But baaa-acro doesmention it as FAR1436 and so does the accidents and incidents page of the Antonov AN-26. Andrewa, please ask Deeday-UK himself that it is a naming convention. Username006 (talk) 05:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
