Talk:2007 Heineken Cup final

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kingsif (talk) 18:56, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the 2007 Heineken Cup Final was the last rugby union match for coach Pat Howard before he returned to Australia to take over the family pharmacy business? Source: "Heineken Cup final: Leicester 9–25 Wasps – Tigers reaction" - BBC Sport, "Corry close to prolonging life at Leicester" - The Independent

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/1989 Football League Fourth Division play-off Final

5x expanded by MWright96 (talk). Self-nominated at 18:04, 29 April 2021 (UTC).

• QPQ done, plenty big enough in timely manner, plenty of refs, copyvio clear, hook cited and faithful to source, good to go. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:07, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2007 Heineken Cup Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 14:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

I can take a look at this later today! — GhostRiver 14:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

• "and the first time" → "as well as the first time"

Background

• Should probably be specified that it was to "provide a new level of professional cross-border rugby competition"
• "in their respective national leagues"
• negotiations between English and French clubs who withdrew from the tournament because of governance flows better if this longer part is at the end
  • That part was removed prior to the publication of this full review MWright96 (talk) 16:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
• Colon after "Tigers won both" for flow
  • Reworded differently MWright96 (talk) 16:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Route to the final

• Subheads should be "London Wasps" and "Leicester Tigers" for parallelism

Wasps

• Delink Adams Park, linked above
• Link whitewash
• First sentence of the third paragraph has a lot going on, can probably be split into two
  • There are only two paragraphs in total in the London Wasps section MWright96 (talk) 16:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Leicester Tigers

• Delink Munster in the second sentence
• Split the sentence beginning "They led Bourgoin" in half after "two conversions". Then the next sentence starts "Although Bourgoin scored 10 points", with a comma after "in the second half"
• "and gain entry to the final"

Match

Pre-match

• Comma after "The referee for the match was Alan Lewis"
• Delink "referee" per WP:OVERLINK
• Comma after "Alain Rolland and Simon McDowell"
• Comma after "The fourth official was Peter Fitzgibbon"
• "A total of 56,000 tickets"
• Delink Alex King, linked above

First half

• Pipe "penalty kick" to Penalty (rugby)

Second half

• Comma after "and passed the ball to Smith"

Details

• Good

Post-match

• "Tigers played worse than Wasps'" → "Wasps outplayed Tigers"

References

• [5] appears to be the same reference listed twice
  • THey are two different versions with the second featuring fuller details of the game's officiators MWright96 (talk) 16:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

General comments

• All photos are properly licensed and are relevant to the article
• No stability concerns in the revision history
• Earwig score comes up yellow, but that's due to attributed direct quotes

All minor fixes; putting on hold for now, and ping me if there are any questions or when it's ready to be looked over again. — GhostRiver 16:16, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

• @GhostRiver: Have made changes except where I have commented MWright96 (talk) 16:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Made one more fix myself (I meant second paragraph where I said third, but rather than instituting another back and forth). Passing now. — GhostRiver 20:22, 9 October 2021 (UTC)