Talk:2006 Alamo Bowl

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Former good article2006 Alamo Bowl was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 31, 2007Good article nomineeListed
November 21, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 4, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the 2006 Alamo Bowl (pictured: the Alamodome) set a record for the most people to view a sporting event live in San Antonio, Texas, as well as the most television viewers ever to watch a bowl game on ESPN?
Current status: Delisted good article

Template

edit

Hello Zzyzx11 - I see you moved the {{NCAAFootballSingleGameHeader}} to the Game Summary, saying it is redundant with {{Linescore Amfootball}}. You are right that the Linescore is completely contained in the {{NCAAFootballSingleGameHeader}}. Since the WikiProject College Football standard is to use {NCAAFootballSingleGameHeader}} at the top, I replaced it there and removed the {{Linescore Amfootball}}. Please let em know what you think. Best, Johntex\talk 05:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Good Article Criteria

edit

Here's how one editor measured the good article criteria against 2006 Alamo Bowl:

1. Well written?: Ok.
2. Factually accurate?: Aggressively footnoted.
3. Broad in coverage?: Well done.
4. Neutral point of view?: Ok.
5. Stability?: Ok.
6. Images?: Verified.

Congrats!—Kghusker 08:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:2006 Alamo Bowl/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

I am reviewing this article for GA sweeps, to make sure older GAs still meet the criteria. While I'm sure it used to meet it, there is a lot of work needed for this article to keep GA status:

  • Refs #1, 2, 3, 15, 20, and 26 are deadlinks and need to be replaced.
  • The pregame section needs to be split up into smaller sections.
  • Look at other Bowl GAs for how to expand and modify the article.

I'm gonna put the article on hold for 5 days. If progress is being made I'll do a more detailed prose review, if not I'll delist this. Wizardman 16:42, 18 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thinking about it a bit more, I'm delisting it now, as it still needs a lot of new work to be done on it. Wizardman 19:37, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:58, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:58, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:2006 Alamo Bowl/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I rated it a B because it could use the 2006-2007 Bowl game template. I felt it was a mid importance because it's not a BCS Bowl. General125 05:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
I added the Infobox. However, it has a required parameter for who performed the National Anthem, and I don't have a source for that. Is there anything else you feel needs to be changed about the article? Johntex\talk 06:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 06:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 05:57, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2006 Alamo Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:59, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2006 Alamo Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2006 Alamo Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 Alamo Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:39, 17 June 2017 (UTC)Reply