Planck length

In physics, the Planck length, denoted P, is a unit of length. It is also the reduced Compton wavelength of a particle with Planck mass. It is equal to 1.616255(18)×10−35 m.[1] It is a base unit in the system of Planck units, developed by physicist Max Planck. The Planck length can be defined from three fundamental physical constants: the speed of light in vacuum, the Planck constant, and the gravitational constant.

Planck length
Unit systemPlanck units
Unit oflength
1 P in ...... is equal to ...
   SI units   1.616255(18)×10−35 m
   natural units   11.706 S
3.0542×10−25 a0
   imperial/US units   6.3631×10−34 in


The Planck length P is defined as:


where   is the speed of light in a vacuum, G is the gravitational constant, and ħ is the reduced Planck constant. Solving the above will show the approximate equivalent value of this unit with respect to the metre:


The two digits enclosed by parentheses are the estimated standard error associated with the reported numerical value.[2][3]

The Planck length is about 10−20 times the diameter of a proton.[4] It can be defined using the radius of the hypothesized Planck particle.


In 1899, Max Planck suggested that there existed some fundamental natural units for length, mass, time and energy.[5][6] These he derived using dimensional analysis, using only the Newton gravitational constant, the speed of light and the "unit of action", which later became the Planck constant. The natural units he further derived became known as the "Planck length", the "Planck mass", the "Planck time" and the "Planck energy".


The size of the Planck length can be visualized as follows: if a particle or dot about 0.1 mm in size (the diameter of human hair, which is at or near the smallest the unaided human eye can see) were magnified in size to be as large as the observable universe, then inside that universe-sized "dot", the Planck length would be roughly the size of an actual 0.1 mm dot. Alternatively there are approximately 62 orders of magnitude between the Planck length (  m) and the diameter of the observable universe (  m). Right in the middle, 31 orders of magnitude (ten million trillion trillion) from either end, is the human hair (diameter ~  μm, or   m).

Theoretical significanceEdit

The Planck length is the scale at which quantum gravitational effects are believed to begin to become apparent in what is called the quantum foam, and where the interactions require a working theory of quantum gravity to be analyzed. [7] The Planck length may also represent the diameter of the smallest possible black hole.[2]

The main role in quantum gravity will be played by the uncertainty principle  , where   is the gravitational radius,   is the radial coordinate,   is the Planck length. This uncertainty principle is another form of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle between momentum and coordinate as applied to the Planck scale. Indeed, this ratio can be written as follows:  , where   is the gravitational constant,   is body mass,   is the speed of light,   is the reduced Planck constant. Reducing identical constants from two sides, we get Heisenberg's uncertainty principle  . The uncertainty principle   predicts the appearance of virtual black holes and wormholes (quantum foam) on the Planck scale.[8][9]

Proof: The equation for the invariant interval   in the Schwarzschild solution has the form


Substitute according to the uncertainty relations  . We obtain


It is seen that at the Planck scale   spacetime metric in special and general relativity is bounded below by the Planck length (division by zero appears), and on this scale, there should be real and virtual black holes.

The spacetime metric   fluctuates and generates a quantum foam. These fluctuations   in the macroworld and in the world of atoms are very small in comparison with   and become noticeable only on the Planck scale. Lorentz-invariance is violated at the Planck scale. The formula for the fluctuations of the gravitational potential   agrees with the Bohr-Rosenfeld uncertainty relation  .[10] Due to the smallness of the value  , the formula for the invariant interval in special relativity is always written in the Galilean metric  , which actually does not correspond to reality. The correct formula must take into account the fluctuations in the spacetime metric and the presence of virtual black holes and wormholes (quantum foam) at Planck scale distances. Quantum fluctuations in geometry are superimposed on the large-scale slowly changing curvature predicted by the classical deterministic general relativity. Classical curvature and quantum fluctuations coexist with each other.[8]

Corollary: Planck black holes with a mass of  g may not “evaporate”, but be stable formations  . The entire mass of the black hole will "evaporate",[11] except for that part of it, which is associated with the energy of zero, quantum vibrations of the black hole's substance. Such vibrations do not raise the temperature of the object and their energy cannot be radiated.

Any attempt to investigate the possible existence of shorter distances, by performing higher-energy collisions, would inevitably result in black hole production. Higher-energy collisions, rather than splitting matter into finer pieces, would simply produce bigger black holes.[12] A decrease in   will result in an increase in   and vice versa. A subsequent increase of the energy will end up with larger black holes that have a worse resolution, not better. Therefore, the Planck length is the minimum distance that can be explored.

The Planck length refers to the internal architecture of particles and objects. Many other quantities that have units of length may be much shorter than the Planck length. For example, the photon's wavelength may be arbitrarily short: any photon may be boosted, as special relativity guarantees, so that its wavelength gets even shorter.[13]

The Planck length is sometimes misconceived as the minimum length of space-time, but this is not accepted by conventional physics, as this would require violation or modification of Lorentz symmetry.[7] However, certain theories of loop quantum gravity do attempt to establish a minimum length on the scale of the Planck length, though not necessarily the Planck length itself,[7] or attempt to establish the Planck length as observer-invariant, known as doubly special relativity.

The strings of String Theory are modeled to be on the order of the Planck length.[7][14] In theories of large extra dimensions, the Planck length has no fundamental, physical significance, and quantum gravitational effects appear at other scales.[citation needed]

Planck length and Euclidean geometryEdit

The Planck length is the length at which quantum zero oscillations of the gravitational field completely distort Euclidean geometry. The gravitational field performs zero-point oscillations, and the geometry associated with it also oscillates. The ratio of the circumference to the radius varies near the Euclidean value. The smaller the scale, the greater the deviations from the Euclidean geometry. Let us estimate the order of the wavelength of zero gravitational oscillations, at which the geometry becomes completely unlike the Euclidean geometry. The degree of deviation   of geometry from Euclidean geometry in the gravitational field is determined by the ratio of the gravitational potential   and the square of the speed of light  :  . When  , the geometry is close to Euclidean geometry; for  , all similarities disappear. The energy of the oscillation of scale   is equal to   (where   is the order of the oscillation frequency). The gravitational potential created by the mass  , at this length is  , where   is the constant of universal gravitation. Instead of  , we must substitute a mass, which, according to Einstein's formula, corresponds to the energy   (where  ). We get  . Dividing this expression by  , we obtain the value of the deviation  . Equating  , we find the length at which the Euclidean geometry is completely distorted. It is equal to Planck length  .[15]

As noted in Regge (1958) "for the space-time region with dimensions   the uncertainty of the Christoffel symbols   be of the order of  , and the uncertainty of the metric tensor   is of the order of  . If   is a macroscopic length, the quantum constraints are fantastically small and can be neglected even on atomic scales. If the value   is comparable to  , then the maintenance of the former (usual) concept of space becomes more and more difficult and the influence of micro curvature becomes obvious".[16] Conjecturally, this could imply that space-time becomes a quantum foam at the Planck scale.[17]

See alsoEdit



  1. ^ "2018 CODATA Value: Planck length". The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty. NIST. 20 May 2019. Retrieved 2019-05-20. CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  2. ^ a b John Baez, The Planck Length
  3. ^ "Planck length". NIST. Archived from the original on 22 November 2018. Retrieved 7 January 2019.
  4. ^ "The Planck Length". Retrieved 2018-12-16.
  5. ^ M. Planck. Naturlische Masseinheiten. Der Koniglich Preussischen Akademie Der Wissenschaften, p. 479, 1899
  6. ^ Gorelik, Gennady (1992). "First Steps of Quantum Gravity and the Planck Values". Boston University. Retrieved 7 January 2019.
  7. ^ a b c d Klotz, Alex (2015-09-09). "A Hand-Wavy Discussion of the Planck Length". Physics Forums Insights. Retrieved 2018-03-23.
  8. ^ a b Charles W. Misner, Kip S. Thorne, John Archibald Wheeler "Gravitation", Publisher W. H. Freeman, Princeton University Press, (pp.1190-1194,1198-1201)
  9. ^ Klimets AP, Philosophy Documentation Center, Western University-Canada, 2017, pp.25-28
  10. ^ Borzeszkowski, Horst-Heino; Treder, H. J. (6 December 2012). The Meaning of Quantum Gravity. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 9789400938939.
  11. ^ Hawking S. W., Commun. math. Phys., 43, 199, by Springer-Verlag, 1975
  12. ^ Bernard J. Carr and Steven B. Giddings "Quantum Black Holes", Scientific American, Vol. 292, No. 5, MAY 2005, (pp. 48-55)
  13. ^ Luboš Motl How to get Planck length, 2012
  14. ^ Cliff Burgess; Fernando Quevedo (November 2007). "The Great Cosmic Roller-Coaster Ride". Scientific American (print). Scientific American, Inc. p. 55.
  15. ^ Migdal A.B., The quantum physics, Nauka, pp. 116-117, (1989)
  16. ^ T. Regge. "Gravitational fields and quantum mechanics". Nuovo Cim. 7, 215 (1958). doi:10.1007/BF02744199.
  17. ^ Wheeler, J. A. (January 1955). "Geons". Physical Review. 97 (2): 511–536. Bibcode:1955PhRv...97..511W. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.97.511.


External linksEdit