Talk:Hilary Linstead

(Redirected from Draft talk:Hilary Linstead)
Latest comment: 7 days ago by GMH Melbourne in topic Copyright problem removed

Copyright problem removed edit

  Prior content in this draft duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://deadline.com/2022/08/hilary-linstead-dead-at-84-baz-luhrman-jane-campion-agent-1235095162/ https://variety.com/2022/film/global/hilary-linstead-dead-dies-picnic-at-hanging-rock-casting-director-1235344533/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. GMH Melbourne (talk) 05:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Comments left by AfC reviewers edit

  •   Comment: I just ran earwig and realized that the tool is not picking up copy-and-paste scenarios from Variety anymore, but the main page now shows copy-and-paste scenarios from Deadline. I will work on those real quick. –CaroleHenson (talk) 05:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  •   Comment: How does the article right now? I did the best I could think of without adding more content and sources to set the information apart. –CaroleHenson (talk) 05:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  •   Comment: I posted this on the creator's user talk page:
    It looks like the biggest problem is list of things, like "writers, directors, composers, choreographers, and cinematographers." which could be summarized to "people in the film industry" - or whatever would be correct for that scenario.
    There are also hits on the names of works. You're good if it's just one name of a work, but where there are two or more from the same source, you just need to find a way to word it so it doesn't look like a copy-and-paste - perhaps summarizing a bit of information from the source about each of the works and put it in two sentences? Perhaps.
    I hope that helps. It would be nice to save it, if that's possible, otherwise a tag for copyright violations will probably mean that the draft will be deleted soon.
    Is this a workable solution GMH Melbourne?–CaroleHenson (talk) 02:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    :They may not be online right now, so I am going to make some edits and see how that goes.–CaroleHenson (talk) 03:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
  •   Comment: The article seems to be notable. A couple more good-quality sources will help better establish that. But unfortunately, there are just too many long sentences identical from the Variety article. GMH Melbourne (talk) 01:38, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply