Talk:Battle of Tauris

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 1 November 2023 by reviewer KeepItGoingForward (talk · contribs).

Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Balkan / European C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bad referencing edit

Latest comment: 1 month ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Citation of classical sources. Classical sources like BAlex are not cited by page number but rather by chapter. This is because there were no page numbers and even if there were the page numbers are always different across additions. See Wikipedia:CGR/Guides/Primary sources or eg Chicago and New Hart sections on classical citations. Ifly6 (talk) 14:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Other thoughts. Citations should not be raw links or just links with their titles. Cf WP:CS:EMBED. Further bibliographic data should be added. I want to note also that the format of the article is in fact set up for {{sfn}} which would remove the current need to repeat the full LCL BAlex citation and then repeatedly link to LacusCurtius. Mark the language of the cited sources with the |lang= parameter. Hircio 46 is not a sufficient citation. History, Military is not an author name. Large sections of the prose text are still uncited. Ifly6 (talk) 14:23, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hircio 46 refers to the Aulo Hircio source in Battle of Tauris#Sources. Yes, 46 is inadequate.

I also fixed the author name in the other source. I will be fixing the other sources as well.

The BAlex source was already there before I started contributing to the draft. I didn't notice this issue, thanks for pointing it out.

I will fix the remaining sources. 🔥Jala peño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 09:51, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Many of the issues with citation, such as incorrect citation of classical sources to Loeb's page numbers, still persist. Please cite to the standard chapter and paragraph numbers which are (usually) consistent across editions. Hircio 46 still persists in the current version. Citation of unreliable sources such as TLDR History and some tourism website should also be removed and replaced. It also doesn't make sense to me why half the citations are written literally in Polish or Italian on the English Wikipedia. If you can translate the titles and metadata please do so. Ifly6 (talk) 03:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Large sections of prose are also still uncited, languages are still not noted, and citation style is still wildly inconsistent. I can understand why this was approved at Articles for Creation's "would you delete" standard but the article is, frankly, not high quality work. Ifly6 (talk) 03:57, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have removed some of the outrageously unreliable sources that were cited in this article. Sorry, random webpages TLDR History, Heritage History, and GoDubrovnik.com's travel corner are not WP:RS. Ifly6 (talk) 06:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

OK 🔥Jala peño🔥 Stupid stuff I did 08:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Discussion at WT:CGR edit

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have started a discussion on stubifying this article at WT:CGR. Ifly6 (talk) 18:09, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic