Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Washington University in St Louis/Behavioral Ecology (Fall)

This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
Behavioral Ecology
Institution
Washington University in St Louis
Instructor
Joan E Strassmann
Wikipedia Expert
Ian (Wiki Ed)
Subject
Behavioral Ecology
Course dates
2017-08-29 00:00:00 UTC – 2017-12-18 23:59:59 UTC
Approximate number of student editors
54


Why take this course? This course is about understanding why organisms evolve to act the way they do. We focus on social behaviors and particularly on understanding conflict and cooperation. How do genetically distinct individuals cooperate while still favoring their own interests? We study things like the evolution of aggression, mating behavior, parental care, communication, and the complexities of living in groups and families. We will learn how natural selection operates on individuals in a social context. We study less material in more depth, with many videos. You will specialize in a certain area. In that area, you will write for Wikipedia and teach high school students on Saturday, 4 November. This class is a lot of work, a lot of fun, and you will never look at an animal in the same way.

What will you learn? This course is about how animals behave in their environment. You will learn to be skeptical and critical of logically incomplete arguments. You will learn how to formulate and evaluate hypotheses. You will learn to evaluate material for accuracy in data, in logic, and in conclusions. You will understand the nature of scientific evidence. You will learn to understand how natural selection operates, particularly on behavior. One of the most effective ways of learning is to teach and communicate the material you just learned. In this class you will learn to teach, to write, to collaborate, and to engage in the dialogue of Wikipedia.

What goes on in the class sessions? During class we will discuss difficult concepts, listen, or give short lectures on difficult points, work together on Wikipedia articles, plan for the high school teaching event, or watch and analyze videos of animal behavior. Short quizzes will occur in class. Attendance is required.

What goes on in the discussion sections? You will meet in a smaller group with your TA in the discussion section. You will have primary literature reading assignments for the discussion sections for the upcoming week. You need to do the reading before class. This is the time for careful learning in depth about how to read the primary literature and how to understand the topic in detail for a specific species. There will be writing activities and grading. Attendance is required.

Student Assigned Reviewing
Ericapryu Cabbage Looper Pyralis farinalis, Papilio cresphontes, Battus philenor
Uhm.s Marsh fritillary, Codling moth Common blue, Apodemia mormo, Dryas iulia, Battus philenor, Zygaena ephialtes, Lycaena rubidus
Wikijmedina
Sjwang312 Common blue, Southern armyworm High brown fritillary, Callophrys xami, Leptidea sinapsis, Samea multiplicalis, Acronicta americana, Fall webworm
Huixi.yu
Sarahxyang Morpho menelaus
Richywutang2018 Aphomia sociella, Phthorimaea operculella
BoozalisHannah Heliconius erato, Epargyreus clarus Grizzled skipper, Apodemia mormo, Papilio homerus, Ostrinia scapulalis, Mediterranean flour moth, Danaus chrysippus
LucasKatherine Heliconius cydno Diamondback moth, Small heath (butterfly), Eurybia elvina
Lily1004 Oeneis chryxus, Parnassius smintheus Geranium bronze, Galleria mellonella, Small pearl-bordered fritillary, Ostrinia scapulalis, Niphanda fusca, Mediterranean flour moth
Engelde Dryas iulia, Agonopterix alstroemeriana Jalmenus evagoras, Small blue, Promethea silkmoth, Deilephila elpenor, Gulf fritillary
Catejiang African armyworm, Polygonia c-album Silver-studded blue, Mythimna unipuncta, Fall armyworm, Eldana, Samea multiplicalis, Garden tiger moth
Arajan1 Mythimna unipuncta, Agrotis ipsilon Cabbage Looper, Dryocampa rubicunda, Small heath (butterfly)
Jerryshen Bogong Moth, Gonepteryx rhamni Marsh fritillary, Cadra figulilella, Small pearl-bordered fritillary, Choristoneura fumiferana, Peridroma saucia, European corn borer
Slzeng Anthocharis cardamines, Eldana Ostrinia furnacalis, African armyworm, Cadra calidella
KmarcusBC Parasemia plantaginis, Hyles lineata Heliconius erato, Fall armyworm, Grayling (butterfly)
ClaudiaEE Silver-studded blue, Acronicta americana
Lilymalcolm Leek moth, Senita moth Lycaena rubidus, Greta oto, Lesser wax moth
Shreenidhipm Eurybia elvina, Eucheira socialis Papilio homerus, Small heath (butterfly), Oeneis chryxus, Zeiraphera canadensis, Phthorimaea operculella, Blue copper
Z.kelley Cadra calidella, Niphanda fusca High brown fritillary, Leptidea sinapis, Prodoxidae, Deilephila elpenor, Agrotis ipsilon
Liu.emily Heliothis virescens Junonia coenia, Silver-studded blue, Fall webworm
Lauraem7 Almond moth, Danaus chrysippus African armyworm, Leek moth, Marsh fritillary, Anartia fatima, Agonopterix alstroemeriana, Parnassius smintheus
Hanna peterman Eriogaster lanestris, Samea multiplicalis
Meganav Ostrinia furnacalis, Greta oto Spodoptera litura, Leek moth, Bogong moth, Pyralis farinalis, Synanthedon myopaeformis, Hornet moth
Mullenm05 Glanville fritillary, Pyralis farinalis
Nicholas Fry
Emily.chu
Emilykh26 Apodemia mormo, Speyeria mormonia
Krecto176 Callophrys xami, Gulf fritillary Pieris oleracea, Small blue, Limenitis arthemis, Gynaephora groenlandica, Deilephila elpenor, Agrotis ipsilon
Sungjaepark Hemileuca lucina, Spodoptera littoralis Heliconius melpomene, Cadra figulilella, Anthocharis cardamines, Danaus chrysippus, Epargyreus clarus, Galleria mellonella
Mnoronha456 Jalmenus evagoras, Mediterranean flour moth Niphanda fusca, Gulf fritillary, Anartia fatima
WAdekunle Chequered skipper, Lycaena heteronea Vanessa atalanta, Almond moth, Bogong Moth
Iginsberg High brown fritillary, Battus philenor Morpho menlaus, Indian mealmoth, Callosamia promethea, Cabbage Moth, European Corn Borer, Glanville fritillary
CR.Tracy Diamondback moth, Lesser wax moth Limenitis arthemis, Marsh fritillary, Dryas iulia, Helicoverpa assulta, Speyeria mormonia, Cabbage looper
Alexandra.payne Small blue, Lycaena rubidus
EmilyKathryn Dryocampa rubicunda, Aphrissa statira
Alemah19 Small pearl bordered fritillary, Garden tiger moth Madrone butterfly, User:ClaudiaEE/sandbox, Talk:Junonia coenia
Felderp Vanessa atalanta, European Corn Borer Silver studded blue, Indian mealmoth, Papilio homerus, Codling moth, Manduca quinquemaculata, Asterocampa celtis
J.j.lee Small heath (butterfly), Choristoneura fumiferana Synanthedon myopaeformis, Cadra figulilella, Aphomia sociella, Heliothis virescens, Peridroma saucia, Zeiraphera canadensis
Moid.ali Papilio homerus, Mamestra brassicae
Jenniferra Limenitis arthemis, Acronicta rumicis Geranium bronze, Parasemia plantaginis, Chequered skipper, Choristoneura fumiferana, Junonia coenia, Anartia fatima
Mperumattam Pieris oleracea, Zygaena ephialtes
J.Prakash2344 Grizzled Skipper, Junonia coenia Diamondback moth, Limenitis arthemis, Heliconius cydno, Fall webworm, Eldana, Spodoptera eridania
Y.shin Spodoptera litura, Deilephila elpenor Morpho menelaus, Silver studded blue, Synanthedon myopaeformis, Parnassius smintheus, Spodoptera littoralis, Epargyreus clarus
Mlopez2121 Geranium Bronze, Hepialus humuli Aphrissa statira, Ostrinia nubilalis, Cydia pomonella
Sahilmehta97 Cadra figulilella, Anartia fatima
RV2014 Bombyx mandarina, Fall webworm Madrone butterfly, Phthorimaea operculella, Acronicta rumicis
Pranita.kaginele Grayling (butterfly), Peridroma saucia Dryocampa rubicunda, Heliconius erato, Callosamia promethea, Heliothis virescens, Madrone butterfly, Garden tiger moth
Srosefuqua Heliconius melpomene, Hornet moth
Mllutz Callosamia promethea, Anartia fatima
S.srivatsa Leptidea sinapsis, Zeiraphera canadensis Spodoptera litura, Eurybia elvina, Cabbage looper
Crieber Fall armyworm, Papilio cresphontes Upiga, Speyeria mormonia, Aphrissa statira
Ecampell22 Tegeticula intermedia, Asterocampa celtis
Vkrishnan2 Indian mealmoth, Ostrinia scapulalis Ostrinia furnacalis, Oeneis chryxus, Chequered skipper
Mhooda
Kaylaholthaus Synanthedon myopaeformis, Manduca quinquemaculata High brown fritillary, Heliconius erato, African armyworm, Asterocampa celtis, Speyeria mormonia, Papilio cresphontes
LucasKat Gynaephora groenlandica Ostrinia scapulalis, Danaus chrysippus, Ephestia kuehniella

Timeline

Week 1

Course meetings
Thursday, 31 August 2017
In class - Introduction to the Wikipedia project

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:

Assignment - Get started on Wikipedia
  • Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you. (To avoid hitting Wikipedia's account creation limits, this is best done outside of class. Only 6 new accounts may be created per day from the same IP address.)
  • It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade.
  • When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page.
Assignment - Wikipedia assignment blog

Begin a blog about your experiences. You can use discussion questions to frame your entries, or reflect on the research and writing process. Create at least one blog entry each week during the Wikipedia assignment.

Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 2

Course meetings
Tuesday, 5 September 2017   |   Thursday, 7 September 2017
Assignment - Evaluate Wikipedia

It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article related to the course and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page.

  • Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
  • Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings.
  • Choose an article on Wikipedia related to your course to read and evaluate. As you read, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these):
    • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
    • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
    • Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
    • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
    • Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
    • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
    • How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
  • Optional: Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — ~~~~.
In class - Discussion
What's a content gap?

Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.

  • Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
  • What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
  • Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
  • What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?

Week 3

Course meetings
Tuesday, 12 September 2017   |   Thursday, 14 September 2017
Assignment - Add to an article

Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article. There are two ways you can do this:

  • Add 1-2 sentences to a course-related article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
  • The Citation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement.

Week 4

Course meetings
Tuesday, 19 September 2017   |   Thursday, 21 September 2017
In class - Discussion
Thinking about sources and plagiarism
  • Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
  • What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
  • What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
  • What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?
Assignment - Choose your topic / Find your sources

It's time to choose an article and assign it to yourself.

  • Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
  • Find an article from the list of "Available Articles" on the Articles tab on this course page. When you find the one you want to work on, click Select to assign it to yourself.
  • In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article.
    • Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page.
    • Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.

Week 5

Course meetings
Tuesday, 26 September 2017   |   Thursday, 28 September 2017
Assignment - Draft your article

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.

Creating a new article?

  • Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox.
    • A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.

Improving an existing article?

  • Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox.



Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 6

Course meetings
Tuesday, 3 October 2017   |   Thursday, 5 October 2017
In class - Discussion
Thinking about Wikipedia
  • What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
  • What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
  • On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
  • If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?
Assignment - Expand your draft
  • Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
  • If you'd like a Wikipedia Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.
Assignment - Peer review and copy edit
  • First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
  • Select two classmates’ articles that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the articles that you want to review. Then in the "My Articles" section of the Home tab, assign them to yourself to review.
  • Peer review your classmates' drafts. Leave suggestions on on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians.
  • As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic?
In class - Intertwine
evaluate a Wikipedia article with your peers!

Intertwine is a platform where you you will be chatting with student editors enrolled in other Wiki Education courses. This week, the featured activities include:


  • Learning Wikipedia’s five pillars as evaluation criteria
  • Evaluating an existing Wikipedia article with your peers
  • Getting to know more Wikipedia editors and learning from each other's experiences

Sign up for a session here. If you haven’t logged in using your Wikipedia account, you will first be redirected to Wikipedia logging page. After logging in using your Wikipedia credentials, you will be able to sign up for our activity.  

Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Week 7

Course meetings
Tuesday, 10 October 2017   |   Thursday, 12 October 2017
Assignment - Respond to your peer review

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!

  • Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
  • Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Wikipedia Expert if you have any questions.

Week 8

Course meetings
Thursday, 19 October 2017
Assignment - Begin moving your work to Wikipedia

Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace."

Editing an existing article?

  • NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
  • Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!
  • Be sure to copy text from your sandbox while the sandbox page is in 'Edit' mode. This ensures that the formatting is transferred correctly.

Creating a new article?

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
  • You can also review the [[../../../training/students/sandboxes|Sandboxes and Mainspace]] online training.
Assignment - Did You Know
  • Optional: For new articles or qualifying expansions of stubs, compose a one-sentence “hook,” nominate it for “Did you know,” (see the DYK instructions handout) and monitor the nomination for any issues identified by other editors. Wiki Education staff can provide support for this process.



Handout: "Did You Know" submissions

Week 9

Course meetings
Tuesday, 24 October 2017   |   Thursday, 26 October 2017
Assignment - Continue improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.
  • Consider adding an image to your article. Wikipedia has strict rules about what media can be added, so make sure to take Contributing Images and Media Files training before you upload an image.

Week 10

Course meetings
Tuesday, 31 October 2017   |   Thursday, 2 November 2017
Assignment - Polish your work

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Wikipedia Expert at any time if you need further help!

In class - Intertwine
review your Wikipedia article draft with your peers!

Intertwine is a platform where you you will be chatting with student editors enrolled in other Wiki Education courses. This week, the featured activities include:


  • Sharing the Wikipedia article your drafted with your peers.  
  • Getting feedbacks from your peers on how to make your Wikipedia article even better
  • Providing feedbacks to your peers and help them improve their article

Sign up for a session here. If you haven’t logged in using your Wikipedia account, you will first be redirected to Wikipedia logging page. After logging in using your Wikipedia credentials, you will be able to sign up for our activity.  



Week 11

Course meetings
Tuesday, 7 November 2017   |   Thursday, 9 November 2017
Assignment - Final article

It's the final week to develop your article.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
  • Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Wikipedia Expert at any time!
Assignment - Reflective essay

Write a reflective essay (2–5 pages) on your Wikipedia contributions.

Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:

  • Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article?
  • Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions?
  • Peer Review: If your class did peer review, include information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers recommend you change on your article?
  • Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback?
  • Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important?

Week 12

Course meetings
Tuesday, 14 November 2017   |   Thursday, 16 November 2017
Milestones

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.