Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2009/February

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting | Proposals | Archive | 2009
Latest comment: 15 years ago by HeartofaDog in topic Proposals, February 2009

Proposals, February 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago133 comments16 people in discussion

{{Germany-castle-stub}} + Category:German castle stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
as there are 70 of them in Category:Castle stubs. Speedy? HeartofaDog (talk) 14:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC) Support. Dr. Blofeld White cat 14:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Split of Category:European boxing biography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The following are viable by from relevant upmerged templates

Speedy anyone. Waacstats (talk) 01:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC) Speedy Dr. Blofeld White cat 10:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Split of Category:Vietnam geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Soon will be around 800 stubs. I would recommend splitting by region of Vietnam in categories. The regions are as follows Northwest · Northeast · Red River Delta · North Central Coast · South Central Coast · Central Highlands · Southeast · Mekong River Delta

However I reckon it may be worth creating upmerged templates for every province of Vietnam if we are to consider the situation more long term. Sometime I'll get around to adding the communes of Vietnam which will make this split very reasonable. I propose creating the following templates and upmerging to the new regional splits. So for example CauMau-geo-stub would feed into Category:Mekong River Delta geography stubs. Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed categories

Proposed templates for upmerging


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Split of Category:French politician stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized category, currently sorting to newly created templates and the following are over 60, more may follow.

Waacstats (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Support, surprised no others are viable too. Dr. Blofeld White cat 20:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

There probably will be others, I've still got over 800 to check. Waacstats (talk) 09:17, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Asian film stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Create as a parent category to house the stubs by country and perhaps any outstanding films which don't hit 60. Dr. Blofeld White cat 19:00, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

{{Soup-stub}} and Category:Soup stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Advise we organise Food and drink stubs a little better. Many of the soups are not even stub categorized. Dr. Blofeld White cat 18:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

by country templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Plan to template the following by nationality, categories for any over 60

Waacstats (talk) 15:06, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Strong support -Especially schools. Dr. Blofeld White cat 18:49, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:European Olympic medalist stubs

Templateing this by country, 2 questions remain.

How do we deal with people who won medals competing for Serbia and Montenegro? Do we classify them under serbia-,Montenegro- templates or do we have a seperate template.
How do we deal with people who won medals competing for the Unified team? Do we classift them as USSR-, their later nationality or with a UnifiedTeam- template? Waacstats (talk) 15:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Politics is the root of all problems huh? I'm not sure, perhaps administer both templates or use the perosns place of birth (either current day Serbia or Montenegro) to judge. you could always create templates to make it easier. Dr. Blofeld White cat 18:49, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:Sri Lankan film stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
my first nomination here. There are about 30 article can fit into this type.--Chanaka L (talk) 17:58, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Categories require 60 articles minimum. I would support {{SriLanka-film-stub}} though. Dr. Blofeld White cat 18:00, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Right then, give us {{SriLanka-film-stub}}. Cheers!--Chanaka L (talk) 18:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Sure, I'm certain the others will have no objection. Perhaps you could stub 30 films and make the category viable? Dr. Blofeld White cat 18:41, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

If you want to go ahead and create the category if you intend to ensure there are at least 60 asap then I have no objections either. But that would probably require more input from the others so I should wait for that. Dr. Blofeld White cat 18:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

  Thank you Dr.Blofeld, about category; I usually don't write film articles. I wanted it for maintenance purposes. But in a year or so we'll have that much. Let's see then. Best of Luck!--Chanaka L (talk) 04:07, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Split of Category:Algae stubs

Bot generated now has 3000 stubs. Any suggestions? Dr. Blofeld White cat 17:55, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Could split by main Category:Algae taxonomic classes but could probably still use further divisional split. Dr. Blofeld White cat 17:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

We now have over 5000. The two existing sub-categories appear to be classes, so lets start with that level and see how we do. Only problem is not all the classes have articles yet. Waacstats (talk) 15:14, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

A matter of time perhaps... Really we ought to contact the bot runner and get him to come to an agreement with stub sorting. Dr. Blofeld White cat 18:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

By-country templates for Euro-archaeology?

Category:European archaeology stubs is of moderate size, and a by-country template split looks desirable (a UK-archaeology-stub would easily pass threshold, as well). Problem is, of course, that we're dealing with ancient history in countries notorious for the changes in borders over that time. Personally, I'd favour the usual "current borders" principle, but if there are better ideas, voice 'em. I'd like to at least propose a {{UK-archaeology-stub}} / Category:United Kingdom archaeology stubs, and suggest debating on the rest. Grutness...wha? 01:06, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Permanent parent cat is split by curent nation so I see no problem in by country templates, categories for any that reach 60.Waacstats (talk) 11:00, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Support Me neither Waacs. Dr. Blofeld White cat 17:55, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:Stub-Class black metal articles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was discuss at sfd.
This Category has over 200 stub articles. The template {{BMB-stub}} looks like it'd be useful.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Michalisphyl (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

I proposed this a while back Dr. Blofeld White cat 17:58, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

You may have proposed a Category:Black metal stubs, but I doubt that you proposed a Category:Stub-Class... anything here! Grutness...wha? 20:36, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Ooops, I meant to post that under "library"!! just below here. Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:Library stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This upmerged stub is over 200 and should definitely be upmerged. Speedy?--TM 16:45, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Ahh, I see. I thought it was an upmerged template already. Well, {{library-struct-stub}} is what I meant and I think it is needed.--TM 00:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
A quick CatScan shows well over 65 articles which would qualify for {{library-struct-stub}}, so I support. Cheers, Pegship (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
{{library-bio-stub}} probably is a good idea at this point too.--TM 04:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Agreed Dr. Blofeld White cat 12:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

I proposed this a while back Dr. Blofeld White cat 16:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

{{Castle-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose:

I have no objection to a euro cat, but think that it is a bit small for now, would rather split out the countries that have 60+ into categories and see what is left. As it is with the French category would leave just 350 articles.Waacstats (talk) 08:41, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Upmerge templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
It seems to me that I can't find more than 60 stubs, so I propose creates two upmerge templates

  1. {{Taiwan-road-stub}}
  2. {{Taiwan-gov-stub}}

The stub list, if you want, is here (scroll down for the other list). Thanks --- impactF=check this 06:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category request for LGBT bio stubs (qualifies under speedy criteria S1)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Hi, requesting category for currently-upmerged stub {{LGBT-bio-stub}} as it now contains 60 articles. Not sure what the standard naming is, but recommend avoiding "LGBT people stubs" as the stub's scope does include people who are not lesbian/gay but are relevent in other ways. (maybe "LGBT biographical stubs" or something similar?) Thanks, Outsider80 (talk) 05:39, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

I am not sure on this one. I think it might be better to create separate stubs like {{LGBT-writer-stub}} and {{LGBT-activist-stub}} rather than a general -bio stub.--TM 16:48, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
The LGBT-bio-stub already exists, it is just upmerged into LGBT-stubs category. If it does continue to exist as a stub type, moving it to its own category would help unclutter the parent category & make the bio stubs easier to find. LGBT-activist-stub also already exists as a stub and category and is populated. Good idea on the writer stub, I didn't realize how many there were (26 writer stubs within the 60 bio stubs). I went through LGBT-bio-stubs & the break-down is:
  • Writers of LGBT topics/themes: 26 stubs
  • LGBT-history related bio stubs (bio stubs with historical significance which do not fall under "writer" or "activist" qualifiers, including also victims of hate crimes): 18 stubs
  • Other -- Artists: only 7, Film-related bio: only 2, Music artsts: only 3, TV-related: only 1
thoughts? Outsider80 (talk) 20:38, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
  • I'd definitely support the original proposal. There were 53 such stubs two days ago and the number is increasing daily. If not for my recent health problems I'd have probably proposed this myself by now. Though I can see the reasoning behind Thomas's counterproposal, I think that a basic LGBT bio category makes sense as an initial move to empty out the LGBT stub category. It would also be a reasonable parent type for the existing activist category. The idea of creating a separate template for writers has its merits, though that's perhaps less urgent. Grutness...wha? 22:48, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Italian church stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy creation for this cat? presently upmerged into Category:European church stubs but now has 60+ articles. HeartofaDog (talk) 23:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy create per precedent. Waacstats (talk) 08:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Split of Category:European Olympic medalist stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose finishing off the split of this cat with the remaining upmerged templates. It may require the reation of templates for historic nations such as {{Bohemia-Olympic-medalist-stub}}, do we want to do this (I think we already have USSR-, Czechoslovakia- and Yugoslavia-) and if so do we upmerge them to the relevent current countries stub cat? We already have 23 categories and 2 upmerged templates. Waacstats (talk) 12:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

How many articles do you think would fit the criteria Bohemian olympic medalist? I support in principle as we tend to be politically correct in such areas. ANy idea how many bios fit the bill? Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Currently 3 articles with another 3 possible articles which I'll try to get round to creating at the weekend. Waacstats (talk) 08:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

split of Category:European actor stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
As with recent splits, create the missing templates here. Waacstats (talk) 19:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Absolutely Dr. Blofeld White cat 22:17, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

On a related note, can upmerged templates for Category:European film director stubs be created for each country, instead of having the Euro-film-director-stub template? Lugnuts (talk) 12:18, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

I'd support that also. The European thing has gone on long enough. Dr. Blofeld White cat 18:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Cheers Dr B. I thought I was going mad when I was adding Germany-film-director-stub, only to find it didn't exist! Lugnuts (talk) 19:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm slowly working my way through the continent categories so I would support this as well. Waacstats (talk) 23:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Yeah that is crazy! I think its time we changed the graphic for them too I hated the old one. Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:25, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:French church stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy creation for this cat? presently upmerged into Category:European church stubs but now has 70+ articles. HeartofaDog (talk) 02:51, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Um well its look as if it has been created... Support anyway. Dr. Blofeld White cat 19:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry - I should have waited.
Strangely, the contents are not sorting alphabetically - not sure what is going on there, but if anyone can see what I've done wrong, please let me know. Thanks, HeartofaDog (talk) 15:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Sorted-someone forgot the noincludes. Waacstats (talk) 23:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Great - thanks.HeartofaDog (talk) 02:21, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Roman Catholic cathedral stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Speedy creation for this cat? presently upmerged into Category:Roman Catholic church stubs but now has 110+ articles.HeartofaDog (talk) 02:01, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

mmmmm. I think I'd prefer a split by country rather than by the status of the building, though we do have the template, so it makes some sense. Grutness...wha? 07:56, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
I see what you mean. I am not sure that many countries have 60+ RC Cathedrals - presumably there wd be no problem breaking out the ones that do at the appropriate time and leaving the remainder permanently in RC-cathedral?
Or do you want to rethink the whole RC-church thing, and just have churches and cathedrals by country? There is certainly about to be a difficulty - in RC countries - with the overlap / duplication between Foo-church-stub and RC-foo-church-stub - (eg) RC churches in France / Churches in France. HeartofaDog (talk) 11:10, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

LGBT magazines and newspapers, and two speedied categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Hi all - subsequent to the recent LGBT split proposal, I'd like to propose two more upmerged templates - {{LGBT-mag-stub}} and {{LGBT-newspaper-stub}}. Looks like they'll each take about 30 articles. I've also inadvertently speedied both Category:LGBT organization stubs and Category:LGBT law stubs, but both should get close to three figures, so hopefully no damage done. Grutness...wha? 23:46, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Forestry stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Surprised this hasn't been ID'd by now, 70+ articles identified, can see preliminary list on userpageminnecologies (talk) 03:05, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Definately. COuld include both forest organizations and articles on forestry issues as well as any notable figures in this field. Dr. Blofeld White cat 11:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Yup - though the orgs and bios should be double-stubbed with any other appropriate stub types, of course. Grutness...wha? 11:45, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Yes, we need a "forestry" stub - I specifically need one. chop chop ;)Nailgunner (talk) 22:14, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose creating templates for all countries for {{Africa-sports-venue-stub}}, as has been done with biographies. This will make sorting stubs into building and structures stub categories much easier and eliminate significant needless double stubbing.--TM 20:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:European athletics biography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
propose upmerged by country templates. Waacstats (talk) 22:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Not done already? Surprised. Support. Dr. Blofeld White cat 01:03, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Diving stubs and Category:Diving biography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised by Grutness.
Disambiguation of, part two. (Part one was in December.)

Diving stubs have been re-tagged with one of four templates, as follows:

If I recall the threshold guidelines correctly, that means that Underwater-diving-stub and Acrobatics-diving-bio-stub qualify for their own categories, Underwater-diving-bio-stub should be upmerged, and Acrobatics-diving-stub... I don't know: does it get a category in order to hold the bio subcat, or does it just get bypassed?

The other question to be settled before proceeding is: Does either type of stub get to keep the existing Category:Diving stubs and Category:Diving biography stubs, or do we mark those as ambiguous and create new categories for both of the precise types? —Paul A (talk) 01:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Mmmmm. That's a tricky one. I'd be loath to split them much more than that, or upmerge, for that matter, given the numbers involved. The best thing might to have the diving bio stubs populating two categories each, giving:
Grutness...wha? 03:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Support Grutness' suggestion. Waacstats (talk) 10:04, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

{{France-church-stub}}, {{Austria-church-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
As upmerged templates in Category:European church stubs, on a par with the several already existing there for other countries. HeartofaDog (talk) 00:51, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

May I take this as a speedy OK?HeartofaDog
I'll say speedy create. for these and any other templates for foo-church-stubs for the euro cat. Waacstats (talk) 10:01, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

(talk) 00:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Yes, actually I did propose the creation of them and many other European ones a while back. Dr. Blofeld White cat 12:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:South American film stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
To mirror previous categories of Category:European film stubs and Category:African film stubs. I'm sure there's plenty of stub articles for films from Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Venezuela and the other S American countries (ex. Argentina and Brazil) to make 60+ stubs. Lugnuts (talk) 20:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Support Not appropriate for Brazil or Argentina obviously as Lugs mentioned but the films from the other countries make it worthwhile and would tie stray stubs together. Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Support, would be an idea to have my country templates rather than one for SouthAm. Waacstats (talk) 09:55, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Ah yes, I forgot to say that originally - I'd do the upmerge template for each country, as per the European stubs. Lugnuts (talk) 11:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
I knew you'd know that but I thought I would make it plain just incase someone else comes round and creates it as southAm- before you create the country-film. Waacstats (talk) 17:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Malagasy politician stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I've had a wild weekend. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 19:48, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Support Barnstar worthy! Do you have a stub count Albert? Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:09, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

I...er, never keep count after a wild weekend... --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 21:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Support speedying. I counted 153 just now.--TM 21:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

New regional geo templates for Mali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I'm currently adding the 703 communes of Mali. With some seperate towns and villages it will soon be around 1000+. It is an early stage given that we only have around 200 Mali stubs at present but I can assure you that it will need to be done eventually and within a week or two. I propose the creation of the following templates by Regions of Mali -they will all expect Bamako be viable for seperate categories as I work through them. At present I believe the only one viable for category is the Kayes region.

Proposal:

Dr. Blofeld White cat 01:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

support templates with the following changes GaoML - there is apparently a Geo district in Burkina Faso, KayesML - there is a Kayes in Congo and SégouML - there is a village in Togo. I don't think we need region in the template but certainly when categories are created (And I Support these once they reach 60) i think it should be of the form FCategory:Foo Region geography stubs. Waacstats (talk) 09:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Ah yes of course, thanks for the note. Actually I think we can get away with them blank though. You see Kayes is only a small town in Congo, it will never get to the stage where we would need stub templates. Kayes in Mali is a region, cercle, commune and town. Also "Geo" district is also a different spelling and is a smaller disrtrict that is also unlikely to have a template created for it. Segou is only a village in TOgo whereas it is a region, cercle, commune and city. The region is probably the size of England at least. If you look on a world map you'll see these names have priority. There shouldn't be any problems without the ML, if in the unlikely event that conflicting tmeplates needed to be made in the future then we can always add an abbreviation after the new ones. Dr. Blofeld White cat 12:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

thanks for that, I am happy that Segou and Kayes probably don't need disambig (we don't have templates for american towns of the same size) and the "Geo" was a misspelling on my part according to Gao (disambiguation) but seen as we don't even have an article yet I'm sure a template is many years off unless someone does a good going over of Burkina Faso. Waacstats (talk) 14:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created upmerged templates as revised by Grutness.
I propose to create a new stub called Haringey borough stub it can be found on my user page User:L07ChLeo3 I have been researching and I have found that it can be used on well over 60 articles as their are many Haringey related articles which are small enough to be counted as stubs L07ChLeo3 14:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Seems reasonable for an upmerged template at least; Category:London geography stubs is around 580, with no current splits by borough. Pegship (talk) 20:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Support, but... are you looking at a general stub (for non-geographic items) or a geo-stub (for geographic items)? Personally I'd suggest having both, but upmerging them in different ways
If either of them get 60 stubs, then separate categories could be created, or if they have 60 between them they could both feed a new Category:Haringey stubs, with the geo one also still feeding the London geo category. Grutness...wha? 22:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC) (native of nearby Barnet)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

footy-bios split

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
the following are viable from existing templates

Waacstats (talk) 18:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Dr. Blofeld White cat 19:03, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Central American sportspeople

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose Category:Central American sportspeople stubs, {{foo-sport-bio-stub}} for all 7 nations nations and {{Foo-footy-bio-stub}} for Guatemala and Belize (the only two that don't currently have them). Waacstats (talk) 18:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Taiwanese sport stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating a stub category with the stub article list here. The new category can include Template:Taiwan-baseball-stub, Template:Taiwan-footyclub-stub, Template:Taiwan-sports-venue-stub, and Category:Taiwanese sportspeople stubs. impactF=check this 02:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

split of Category:German Olympic medalist stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is oversized, I see two options one is to split out E/W Germany with

or to split by sport as we have with the US where the following would all be viable

. Waacstats (talk) 23:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure what is standard naming practice with these, but {{Foo-Olympic-bar-medalist-stub}} (e.g., Germany-Olympic-swimming-medallist-stub}} would flow better, IMO (and yes, for continental Europe we'd normally use UK spelling, so they should all be "medallist". This, however, probably needs to wait for the outcome of a massive renaming of permcats which i think may be called for, so going with one -l- for now but keeping an eye out for future changes is possibly the best option). Grutness...wha? 00:58, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
If we go with the Foo-Olympic-bar then the US subcats (the only other country we have split this way) need to be renamed. I agree that we probably do need a rename to medallist at some point. I don't think we need both axis of split do you have a preference for either. Waacstats (talk) 08:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Not really - but I suspect that a further split will be needed sooner if we go for the EG/WG one. Grutness...wha? 23:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Hmm yes the naming does seem a bit of a mouthful. I support though based on numbers Dr. Blofeld White cat 13:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry about the delay in responding fellas. I'm not sure what we should do about naming in all honesty. I would completely support the category and template naming conventions above. I would also support East and West templates. Dr. Blofeld White cat 18:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Russian/Soviet films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as so cannily revised by Lugnuts.
Following this discussion, I'd like to create the following stub categories:

The former is for films from 1917-1991 (240+ articles currently in this category) and the latter for post-1991 films (100+ articles in this category). Lugnuts (talk) 18:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Support as long as these are the other way round (Russia post 1991 and soviet 1917-1991). Waacstats (talk) 21:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Hehe, well spotted! Lugnuts (talk) 08:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Support -good catch Lugnuts! Dr. Blofeld White cat 15:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Handball biography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Following categories and templates has already been created:

Don't know if they have been proposed before, was made aware of the situation here. But I'm interested in creating stub-templates for the remaining nations, with categories for any that reaches 60 stubs. (Similar templates and categories have already been made for association football.)
Speedy? lil2mas (talk) 00:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Split from Category:Track and field athletics biography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
All the following are viable from upmreged templates

Speedy? Waacstats (talk) 11:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy--TM 15:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Yes but some uniformity might be nice... either Mexico/Portugal or Mexican/Portuguese... Grutness...wha? 21:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
someone found the deliberate error:), obviously bsed on all the other categories it should be Category:Portuguese athletics biography stubs, thanks for spoting that grutness. Waacstats (talk) 15:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Split from Category:Canoer stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Romania-canoe-bio-stub}} has reached 60 propose Category:Romanian canoeist stubs to fit in with post SFD name. Waacstats (talk) 11:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Support. Grutness...wha? 21:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Go for it Dr. Blofeld White cat 15:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2009/February&oldid=1141871336"