Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 March 22
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Unused. Club plays in third level, so probably useless anyway. Pelmeen10 (talk) 23:16, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, it's unlikely any of the entries will ever meet WP:ATHLETE. CRwikiCA talk 18:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Template:Qualifier (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
A 2012 era Wiktionary template copied to wikipedia which is essentially unused, has no useful functionality on this project and which doesn't work properly. This template takes arbitrary parameters and returns them as a comma separated list wrapped in brackets, with each comma, bracket and term wrapped in span tags adding a css class. On Wiktionary the sitewide common.css page contains css rules to style these terms as part of the dictionary, those rules do not exist here so the template does nothing. This is used in one article to create the text "(colloquial)" twice, two talk pages containing content copied from wiktionary, and an essay about how wikipedia should invent it's own set of pronouns for editors. I don't see why we would need templates designed for a dictionary project that don't do anything useful, so I propose removal of the half dozen uses and deletion. 192.76.8.84 (talk) 18:55, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Only used on one article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. If a user wants it, let me know and I can userfy it. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox Indian (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
No transclusions, documentation, or categories. Created in November 2022. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:10, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete — DaxServer (t · m · c) 13:51, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Indic scripts are not used in infoboxes per policy (WP:INDICSCRIPT) because such uses always turn into a mess with people unable to agree with which scripts are "official" or "native" or "important". An infobox which consists of nothing except Indic scripts and their transliterations therefore has no situations in which it should be used. 192.76.8.84 (talk) 18:40, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Userfy. This could have uses similar to that of Template:Infobox Buddhist term. Despite the above comment, such use is not necessarily precluded by INDICSCRIPT, as that guideline doesn't apply to e.g. article sections. Agree that the template is not ready for use. – Uanfala (talk) 23:05, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).