Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 February 8

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< February 7 February 9 >

February 8 edit

Template:Mvec edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:33, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-main space use template that, from what I can tell, can be done with {{vec}} and {{math}} (or {{mvar}} if appropriate). Izno (talk) 22:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:50, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    This would need to be converted before substing. Izno (talk) 01:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    In that case, delete and replace with either template cited. Since you said single-use I thought it was a subst proposal. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:13, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kercher timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content with no template parameters. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Keiyō Line graphical timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content with no template parameters. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Awards navboxes have a long history of being supported by the community (implicitly if not explicitly), with only a select few having been removed by TFD that I can recall (most lacking a parent article IIRC). If you sincerely believe templates like these shouldn't exist, or even that we should have minimum requirements for this kind of awards navbox, I would recommend an RFC at a place of your choosing, perhaps WP:CLN or WP:VPPRO/WP:VPPOL. Izno (talk) 21:27, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Entries in this WP:NAVBOX are too loosely related Indagate (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This is a standard year-by-year navbox showing who or what won a given award that year. We have hundreds of these. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. They are all very closely related as evidence by Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Picture. A navbox for film awards is very common and singling one specific award should not be done and is basically WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Gonnym (talk) 20:31, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep How are they loosely related? You can say that about every other award navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment To elaborate further, the films linked in this navbox only have award templates for Golden Raspberry so disagree they're standard. Also last year's Oscar Best Picture for example, CODA, only have a handful of the most notable, and Golden Raspberry is not particulary notable for any of their awards based on secondary source coverage. Point 3 of WP:NAVBOX says "the articles should refer to each other, to a reasonable extent" which these do not at all. Point 5 says "if not for the navigation template, an editor would be inclined to link many of these articles in the See also sections of the articles", don't think reasonable argument to do that for any of them. My reasoning has nothing to do with not liking it but based on WP:NAVBOX. Arguing that one cannot be deleted without another is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. A list existing is not a reason for a navbox, WP:NAVBOX says a list can be a substitute for a navbox. Indagate (talk) 22:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Shakey's V-League 11th Season Reinforced Open Conference women's division edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution. Frietjes (talk) 17:53, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2004 Summer Olympics men's basketball group A standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:25, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution, and converting transcluding articles to use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2004 Summer Olympics men's water polo group A standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:25, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution, and converting transcluding articles to use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2004 Summer Olympics Angola men's basketball team roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:24, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution, and converting transcluding articles to use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2004 Summer Olympics Australia men's water polo team roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:24, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution, and converting transcluding articles to use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2015 Pan American Games Canada women's baseball team roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:24, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution, and converting transcluding articles to use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 16:13, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Intellectualism edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ill-defined template with no clear purpose, parent article Intellectualism is an unfocused stub that only cites dictionary entries and two seemingly unrelated subtopics, and template appears to be about multiple different topics that happen to share the same word. - car chasm (talk) 04:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Connects articles on the subject. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    What subject are these articles connecting? They appear (to me) to be grouped by the fact that they all have the same word (Intellect) in them rather than any topical grouping. - car chasm (talk) 05:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:10, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I tend toward delete here per nom. Izno (talk) 04:07, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The template doesn't appear to be about a single, coherent topic. V27t (talk) 16:38, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, doesn't seem to be a coherent topic per above. Frietjes (talk) 22:07, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kannada poets in 17th century edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:27, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Kannada poets templates. If these are wanted, they can be added at Kannada poetry or another related page, however the style should really be changed if that happens. Gonnym (talk) 13:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The list is better used for categorization or some article list than on template space. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lifespan of actors who have played the Doctor edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Doctor Who template. Gonnym (talk) 13:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lifespan of each Ukrainian president edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and clearly broken template. If creator is still working on it (and requests it), move to their sandbox, otherwise delete. Gonnym (talk) 13:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of aqueous ions edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 15. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:27, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of mesons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Data already at List of mesons. Gonnym (talk) 13:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, this is clearly an article draft that has been placed in the wrong namespace. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PhotoSet edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused style template. Gonnym (talk) 13:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pre-Marian edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar with very bad color contrast. Gonnym (talk) 13:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ProjectTop edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused but also does not seem like a template and more of a promotional page. Gonnym (talk) 13:01, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MAX Light Rail RDT edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated and not needed on Max Light Rail. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 00:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. Gonnym (talk) 17:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Obama family tree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted this with credit given to the creator on the Family of Barack Obama article. Was single-use and works better as an inline collapsible chart instead of a bloated template. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:21, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 00:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as now unused. Gonnym (talk) 17:45, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Family of Michelle Robinson Obama edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced usages as a navbox with the Michelle Obama navbox I created which does a better job of connecting articles of family members than a tree chart using the navbox parameter with transclusion. Substituted this on the main article on the Obama family and works better as an inline collapsible chart instead of a bloated template. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 00:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as now unused. Gonnym (talk) 17:45, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IDF Enlisted ranks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. More detailed charts exist on Israel Defense Forces ranks. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 00:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 17:43, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LEN Champions League Performance by clubs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Formerly single-use that has been substituted on European Cup, Euroleague and LEN Champions League records and statistics. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 00:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as now unused. Gonnym (talk) 17:18, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_February_8&oldid=1139704623"