Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 September 3

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< September 2 September 4 >

September 3 edit

Template:2018 Winter Paralympics wheelchair curling results edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content merged into {{2018 Winter Paralympics wheelchair curling standings}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:23, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Req edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:16, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I found this template while removing a redlink in a See also section per MOS:SEEALSO. I went through all the transclusions and the majority were also in the See also section. Some were also on articles that had since been created, so I changed those to normal wikilinks. This leaves six left in article space. Judging from the comments in Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2012_October_31#Template:Req this TFD and the lack of use in the last 10 years, I don't believe anyone is actually using this today. MB 20:46, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:55, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This template was created by a banned user in 2008 to make some bot or script they are running easier. Whatever task was being done then has clearly failed to catch on and retain usefulness 12 years later. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:40, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:DSLR cameras with movie mode edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At a minimum, this needs to be renamed - I haven't counted, but I'm reasonably sure that at least half of the bodies listed aren't even DSLRs in the first place. Categorization into "High-end", "Mid-range" and "Entry-level" is not based on any consistent criteria as far as I can tell (and even if it were, WP:OR). I couldn't name a single camera that came out in the last few years and didn't have some kind of video mode, awful or otherwise, so any right to exist this template may have had back in 2009 is long gone. Dr. Duh 🩺 (talk) 19:32, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:7TeamRoundRobin-LLWS Region edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:31, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:6TeamBracket-Reseed edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{6TeamBracket}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:53, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. – Pbrks (t • c) 17:55, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • * Keep. It isn't redundant to {{6TeamBracket}}. 6TB assumes that the winners of the top first round match play the top seed in round 2. 6TB-R cuts this link and covers situations such as happens in British rugby league (Super League) where the top seed plays the lowest remaining seeded team in round 2 - not necessarily the winner of the top first round match. Nthep (talk) 13:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Striking own comment. Turns out 6TB has an under-documented feature that allows it to work in the same way as 6TB-R. Nthep (talk) 20:52, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:6TeamRR-2Group-with-finals edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unused. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:17, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. –Aidan721 (talk) 13:35, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. – Pbrks (t • c) 17:55, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:6TeamRoundRobin edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:16, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. –Aidan721 (talk) 13:09, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. – Pbrks (t • c) 17:55, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:6TeamRoundRobin-LLWS Region edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:19, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. –Aidan721 (talk) 03:59, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. – Pbrks (t • c) 17:55, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:6TeamBracket-WC edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:19, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by {{6TeamBracket-Consols}} –Aidan721 (talk) 03:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. – Pbrks (t • c) 17:55, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_September_3&oldid=1109629049"