Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 May 9

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. All relevant articles have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Dnipro Metro. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:29, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. All relevant articles have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Dubai Metro. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:09, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single use template that isn't even used correctly. Izno (talk) 04:57, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not needed. Gonnym (talk) 11:44, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:19, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An old template that really just constitutes banner cruft at this point (and probably even when it was created). I would have no issue with adding header wikitext and substing to the pages it's on. Izno (talk) 04:55, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the "Last updated in 2009" text. Gonnym (talk) 11:46, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:17, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused after I've removed it from five talk pages which don't use bare URLs, even if they did over a decade ago. I'll leave aside that the framing of the template also seems not to be compliant with current policy, even if it may have been 13 years ago.... Izno (talk) 03:38, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. contradicts current guidelines which are in place to prevent lint rot. Gonnym (talk) 11:47, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not compliant with current guidelines/practices and not worth keeping as historical. Hog Farm Talk 03:33, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:31, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. All relevant articles have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Rapid Metro Gurgaon. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:32, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).