Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 August 22

< August 21	August 23 >

August 22 edit

Template:Rugby union at the Maccabiah Games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rugby union at the Maccabiah Games (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

None of the event years exist as articles anymore, rendering this template unused. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:20, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:28, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LSD tracks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:49, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LSD tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unnecessary track list. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Letters with grave/old2021 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Letters with grave/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with breve/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with cedilla/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with double grave/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with ring/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with acute/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with diacritic/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with macron/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with hook above/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with diaeresis/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with inverted breve/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with ogonek/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with caron/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with circumflex/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with hook/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with double acute/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with smooth breathing/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with horn/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Letters with dot/old2021 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These templates were all saved as some sort of archive, which is 1) something we don't do and 2) something we don't need to do. It may have been useful at some point for one or two of these, but we neither needed all of them then, and we don't need any of them now. None are used/transcluded meaningfully anywhere today. Izno (talk) 19:06, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. Full redesign (Jan 2022) made these obsolete. (background: I was involved. Some months of preservation was deemed useful in case inacceptable issues showed up after switchover). Since actual letter lists were copied into the new templates, is WP:HISTMERGE to consider? -DePiep (talk) 19:59, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you did the work for the new templates, no, HISTMERGE is not relevant. I am not sure it would be relevant regardless. Izno (talk) 03:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Yes I did. DePiep (talk) 05:44, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Australian baseball postseason edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:21, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Australian baseball postseason (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. No transclusions. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:26, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:51, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UEFA Europa Conference League winning managers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 15:17, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UEFA Europa Conference League winning managers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The purpose of a template is for navigation. There is only 1 manager that has won this, so this doesn't aid navigation at all. Should delete and re-create in around 2026-2027, when there will be around 5 blue links (and therefore a valid use case for a template) Joseph2302 (talk) 15:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:10, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. Giant Snowman 18:27, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Giant Snowman 18:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cima Subdivision edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 August 29. Izno (talk) 15:17, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cima_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dubin-Some edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:49, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dubin-Some (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused citation template. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:44, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).