Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 14

< April 13	April 15 >

April 14 edit

Template:Members of the 1921 Legislative Council of Ceylon edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:20, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Members of the 1921 Legislative Council of Ceylon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Members of the 1924 Legislative Council of Ceylon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, no mainspace articles, and better handled by the list on Legislative Council of Ceylon and the member category it's categorized under. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:12, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or convert to article and modify template. This style of navbox is just horrible. It's huge in size and acts more as content than as a navbox. If this information is wanted, then convert to an article (1921 Legislative Council of Ceylon) and modify the navbox to only include the top headers (Ex offico Members, Nominated Members, and Elected Members) without any sub-headers. This will eliminate many of the red linked sections and greatly reduce the size of the template. If this information isn't wanted, then just delete. Gonnym (talk) 04:54, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep: These are part of a series of parliarmentians by year. This project is still an ongoing one that is actively being worked on by multiple members at the moment, so red links are being created. But this template is a little more detailed than others because the main article (1921 Legislative Council of Ceylon) has not yet been created. The information is all important and ideally it will be simplified down one or two levels but there is no reason to delete it.--Blackknight12 (talk) 16:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Thessaloniki Metro templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Thessaloniki Metro templates (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Now unused doc template after all templates it was transcluded at were deleted in previous TfDs. Gonnym (talk) 19:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:23, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Thessaloniki Metro doc sources edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Thessaloniki Metro doc sources (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Now unused doc template after all templates it was transcluded at were deleted in previous TfDs. Gonnym (talk) 19:46, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:24, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Porto Metro color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Porto Metro color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Replaced with Module:Adjacent stations/Porto Metro. All articles and templates updated. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:03, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:23, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Australia FHW Squad 2011 Oceania Cup edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Australia FHW Squad 2011 Oceania Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The 2011 Women's Oceania Cup had two teams, and Australia finished second. Not an important enough competition to warrant a specific squad template Joseph2302 (talk) 16:09, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:23, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:State parks of Arizona map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:State parks of Arizona map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:State parks of Washington map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Both unused and the two articles these maps were created for, List of Arizona state parks and List of Washington state parks, already have maps on there. The Washington article already has a clickable map. Unless this Arizona Map is intended to replace the text-based map on the Arizona article, then it can be kept for that purpose. Also, the map used on the Washington State article has more links to state parks than this one. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:55, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm good with removing the unused Washington map that I created. Vermiceli (talk) 23:30, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MCOTM edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:29, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MCOTM (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The collaboration project has been dead since 2006 (3 months after it started). The other templates in the set were already deleted back in 2014. Gonnym (talk) 09:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LdA-a edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:29, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LdA-a (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:LdC-c (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:LdC-z (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:LdN-n (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:LdO-o (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:LdS-s (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:LdS-u (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused simple link templates which shouldn't be used at all as the link itself is a MOS:EGG link. Gonnym (talk) 08:08, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; they were a kludged work-around for bad formatting. Useddenim (talk) 03:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Category warning edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 25. Primefac (talk) 12:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Category_warning (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).