Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 September 16

September 16 edit

Template:Pronunciation-Non-English edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is a completely unnecessary duplicate of Template:Needs IPA and Template:Pronunciation needed. I don't think there's really any benefit to splitting requests for pronunciation guides into "English" and "Everything else". Aside from the fact that this is using the wrong type of message box the issue this is supposed to be used to tag is rather minor and does not require a full banner template. The template is also a technical mess, with broken mark-up, template loops and non-existent categories, and does not sort tagged pages into any kind of clean-up or maintenance category. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 21:26, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2016 Bernie Sanders presidential campaign edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:41, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A single-use template that's actually a fork of an infobox. Infoboxes like these are not used as separate templates. This should be substituted on the endorsements article for the 2016 Bernie campagain. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Réseau Ferroviaire Rapide routemap edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:08, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused since its creation. Mackensen (talk) 11:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pennine Bridleway edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused since its creation. Mackensen (talk) 11:40, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Archive list long inline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:38, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{Archive list}} with some options pre-specified, almost all transclusions are through {{Warning archive notice}}. Just using {{Archive list}} is preferable since that makes it more configurable. --Trialpears (talk) 17:26, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 07:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. 2 uses left means there is no real need for this. Gonnym (talk) 12:57, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).