Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 October 30

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< October 29 October 31 >

October 30 edit

Template:Blackmans Point weatherbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not sure what for if it were to be. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:24, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Brisbane City FC seasons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 6. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:22, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Branching edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:14, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tennis in Scotland edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:23, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template includes an arbitrary list of notable Scottish players. What even makes a player notable enough to be included on this list? Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:33, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Wheelchair tennis at multi sports events edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to Template:Infobox tennis tournament year (all replaced) Sod25 (talk) 18:57, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Olympic/Paralympic tennis navboxes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:17, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to Template:Infobox tennis tournament event (all transclusions replaced). Sod25 (talk) 18:21, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all All the articles linked already have navboxes to navigate between the respective Olympic tournament. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:04, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Barbadian presidential elections edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete Barbadian presidential elections , replacing with {{Politics of Barbados}} pending more elections Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:55, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Barbadian presidential elections with Template:Barbadian elections.
A presidential election is a type of election, and so should be a new line in Template:Barbadian elections. Also Template:Barbadian presidential elections has only two links, so should not exist as a separate template, as the purpose of templates is to navigate between articles- so makes sense to merge it into the broader template Joseph2302 (talk) 09:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose merge There is a long-established consensus that non-public elections are not listed on the main national elections navigation templates, hence why separate templates for indirect presidential elections like this exist. However, as there's only been one presidential election to date in Barbados, I would support deleting the presidential elections template for now until there are other articles in the series that it can provide a navigational function for. Number 57 09:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Then wouldn't a better solution be to merge for now until enough presidential elections pages are created and then split? A shame to lose a valid navigation link. Gonnym (talk) 09:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think so, as it will almost certainly be used as justification to start adding them into other templates. However, I would support it being added into {{Politics of Barbados}} (which also appears on most Barbadian election articles) instead. Cheers, Number 57 10:03, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Adding link to {{Politics of Barbados}} and deleting template is also fine by me. If that's the usual way of handling these types of elections. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:32, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge This is single-use and while the Presidency of Barbados is a new position. Maybe over time more elections will happen thus giving the need for a separate template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You said there are examples of this. Any particular indirect elections which we don't include on main elections navboxes? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:34, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@WikiCleanerMan: Yes, see for example {{Albanian presidential elections}}/{{Albanian elections}}, {{Indian presidential elections}}/{{Indian elections}}, {{Italian presidential elections}}/{{Italian elections}}, {{Latvian presidential elections}}/{{Latvian elections}}, {{Pakistani presidential elections}}/{{Pakistani elections}} etc. The nominator is also happy with the suggestion to list on the 'Politics of' template, so I hope that is a reasonable solution. Cheers, Number 57 15:52, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. I'm still of the opinion the template should not stay as is until more presidential elections happen. But if merging to the politics sidebar is feasible then that is okay. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:08, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Number 57 - consistency here outweighs having a small navbox. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:06, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • If it's not merged, then it should be deleted, because it serves no usefulness as a template on its own. Templates are meant to navigate between articles, and this one doesn't do that. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:14, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Elli: Regarding Joseph2302's comment and what this discussion should result in, I think there is an emerging consensus that a merge to {{Politics of Barbados}} would be a suitable outcome. Cheers, Number 57 19:38, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:18, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bold taxon list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:12, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The template completes a set, described at Template:Species list/doc. In theory, the template could be used; for example, we don't usually have articles on extinct species, as opposed to extinct genera. In this case, the species names in a list of species belonging to the genus would be set up as redirects to the genus and so would typically be in bold. However, as it's not used, there seems no reason not to delete it, provided the documentation is updated. (It is just invokes {{#invoke:TaxonList|main|bold=yes|...}}, so is easy to recreate if it were ever needed.) Peter coxhead (talk) 20:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Buddha's Birthday edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:16, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not needed. Not sure the date from May of this year is the actual date. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bottledinsanity edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:16, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Humorous as it may be it remains unused and unlikely to be kept by the creator who has retired from the site. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:59, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Born in edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:12, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:56, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bourbon family tree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:11, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not needed as the family tree is already on the House of Bourbon article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bold link if not equal edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:07, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:24, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Basketball squad start edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:06, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Vietnam/old edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:00, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is obsolete, so we should delete it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 14:13, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ScreenplayDB edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:00, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know exactly what this template is used for, maybe? Did Q28 make a mess today? 14:11, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fileby edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:00, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template seems to be obsolete, so we should delete it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 14:10, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:H:grc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:01, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template is deprecated and no pages use it now. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 14:05, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FAALID edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:03, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are no pages using this template that seem to be obsolete. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 14:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ifeqall edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:03, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now it is also possible to use the parser directly, so this template is no longer used. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 14:02, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tfd-doc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:03, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is no longer used. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 14:01, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:17, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as not needed and an end run around normal process. Edit requests and noinclude tags can be used to properly tag protected templates for deletion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:09, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Xpdoocc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:03, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It should be used in the example of the template, but it is no longer used. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 13:57, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Raster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:03, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is difficult to say whether the template meets the criteria of G2. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 13:56, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_October_30&oldid=1053891862"