Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 March 12

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< March 11 March 13 >

March 12 edit

Template:Pakistan–United Arab Emirates relations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infrequently used. The majority of the links in the template are linked to categories. Aside from the eponymous article, there are no specific articles about the relations between Pakistan and the UAE used in the template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pakistan–Turkey relations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infrequently used. The majority of the links in the template are linked to categories. Aside from the eponymous article, there are no specific articles about the relations between Pakistan and Turkey used in the template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per my comment above, I don't see anything special about Pakistan–Turkey relations that warrant this template. Pakistan–Turkey relations exists and is sufficient. Nigej (talk) 11:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pakistan–Saudi Arabia relations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infrequently used. The majority of the links in the template are linked to categories. Aside from the eponymous article, there are no specific articles about the relations between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia used in the template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Australia–Pakistan relations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infrequently used. The majority of the links in the template are linked to categories, some of which are cricket tours that have nothing to do with the two countries relations. Aside from the eponymous article, there are no specific articles about the relations between Australia and Pakistan used in the template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per my comment above, I don't see anything special about Australia–Pakistan relations that warrant this template. Australia–Pakistan relations exists and is sufficient. Nigej (talk) 11:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ig header edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:International goals header. Izno (talk) 00:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Ig header with Template:International goals header.
Duplicate templates, Template:International goals header has proper documentation and includes a column for a reference to is more useful Joseph2302 (talk) 18:06, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge Clearly serving the same purpose. "International goals header" is the better name. Only about 200 transclusions of each, indicating that most international goalscorers don't use either. On that basis subst/delete would be another plausible option. Nigej (talk) 09:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 10:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lfc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not transcluded anywhere, and it's more effort to use this template than to just write L.F.C. Combined with the fact that many football teams are now called X Women rather than X L.F.C, there doesn't seem a point to it Joseph2302 (talk) 18:04, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 10:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FIFA World Cup Bronze Boot edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The FIFA World Cup Golden Boot is notable, but we don't need a template for people who scored the 2nd or 3rd most goals in a competition Joseph2302 (talk) 18:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Treats navboxes as decorations. Why would someone want to navigate between footballers that scored the second/third most goals in a competition? Fails much of WP:NAVBOX. Nigej (talk) 18:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 10:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree, I have added them, and tagged accordingly. I support deletion of both of these (and would have nominated them at the same time had I realised they existed). Joseph2302 (talk) 18:17, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support deleting the other two too. Rationale also applies to these - why would someone want to navigate between the 2nd or 3rd best players in a competition. Nigej (talk) 11:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Arthur Marvin edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cinematographer credits are not applicable under WP:FILMNAV. And the single director credit obviously doesn't require a template. DoubleCross (‡) 15:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Article Arthur Marvin has a "Filmography" which provides sufficient navigation. Nigej (talk) 16:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Earthquakes in 1812 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 March 25. Izno (talk) 15:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_March_12&oldid=1014166993"