Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 7

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User page. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 21:42, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Userpage blue border short, Template:Userpage blue border short rounded and Template:Unencycpage with Template:User page.
Template:User page/sandbox can now support the short style with the parameter |short=yes. See Template:User page/testcases for examples. Gonnym (talk) 20:45, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:User page. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 21:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

After Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 July 12#Template:User page rounded and Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 July 28#Template:Usertalkpage {{User page}} supports both these styles and usage on talk pages. There is nothing to merge, just a simple replace. Gonnym (talk) 20:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 September 14. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 21:40, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 21:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless template. Parent article doesn't exist, and only 1 link (to an article that I've nominated for AFD) Joseph2302 (talk) 16:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).