Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 November 29

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was subst and delete. No opposition, reasonable nomination, and a past precedent of not keeping single-transclusion templates such as this in the template space. Due to low participation this can be considered a soft deletion. Primefac (talk) 02:23, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This template presents tables that should be in article text and not presented as a template, as per Wikipedia:Template namespace#Guidelines. Of concern the information presented is unsourced and fails WP:V. It has been tagged as unsourced for and sources have not been added. The template was started by an editor who is no longer active on Wikipedia. Ahunt (talk) 22:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 02:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No one literally uses this template to use their signature. The only way users sign their name and time would usually use "~~~~". Also, a template for this was created 6 months ago. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 16:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 7. Primefac (talk) 02:26, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 6. (non-admin closure) EN-Jungwon 06:11, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).