Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 December 17

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 16 December 18 >

December 17 edit

Module:London Stock Exchange edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 25. (non-admin closure) –Piranha249 15:14, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Women's Rugby World Cup Unions edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such thing as a Women's Rugby World Cup Union, these are already covered by {{World Rugby}}. This would also duplicate the navbox {{Women's national rugby teams}} if it actually linked to the teams that have or have not played in the RWC instead of linking to the governing bodies that oversee both men's and women's sports or rugby union in articles - it does both randomly. Thus, unnecessary, duplicative, incorrect, and now unused template. Bob247 (talk) 22:11, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unnecessary sandboxes 2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:17, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(50 templates) Reason: The same as last time. --TheImaCow (talk) 18:47, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sunni leaders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. G5, User:IslamMyLoveMyLife. Favonian (talk) 16:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely imprecise scope, and used for very dubious purpose: How are these people 'Sunni leaders' when the concept of Sunni did not even exist for say, Muhammad, and when the actions of half the people on this list gave birth to the distinction between Shi'a and Sunni Islam? How is Fatima specifically a 'Sunni' leader? For that matter, *what* is a Sunni leader supposed to be? This is yet another POV-pushing effort by the template creator to claim the early Alids as 'Sunni'... Constantine ✍ 18:08, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • The Ahl al Kisa section has been removed, Anyway, the early Alids were both Sunnis as well as Shiites, There is nothing like POVPUSHING in it. CalligrapherAR (talk) 19:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I've to concur with Constantine. None of these were "Sunni leaders" as there were no Sunnis back then whom they could "lead";) Also, early Alids weren't Sunnis or Shiites. The two denominations arose in later centuries.--AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 22:04, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Blank editnotices edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:20, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Everthing is blank and unused. These notices contained Template:AbortionGSEN, which was removed everywhere. See also here and here. --TheImaCow (talk) 12:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Achilles'29 squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 25. (non-admin closure) –Piranha249 15:13, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox typeface/link edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:20, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template still in work since its creation over a decade ago. Izno (talk) 05:29, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:26, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete but make sure that the pages that use its parent template are not broken as a result. (there are many!) --Down10 TACO 04:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • This template is unused. --Izno (talk) 19:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Conference bowl record edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 25. (non-admin closure) –Piranha249 15:13, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_December_17&oldid=996270214"