Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 April 24
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. WP:LST works fine for the discussed article family trees. Primefac (talk) 01:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Looks like a sandbox start at a chart, but never finished (~18 months ago) and creator is no longer active. Not used on any page. Agricolae (talk) 04:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment. Not sure, per WP:NOTFINISHED. Numerous similar templates in Category:Greek mythology templates and the rest of Category:Family tree templates. Could it be instead have contents merged from for instance non-wikified in-article template of Hera#Genealogy? PPEMES (talk) 09:23, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:NOTFINISHED should not be applied to templates, which other users may use, not knowing if the code is completed or not and often without the knowledge on how to fix it (unlike adding a sentence to an article). If anyone wants the template, ask to have it userfy to your userspace, otherwise delete and refund if later asked for it. I'll note that Zeus#Genealogy of the Olympians already has a tree. --Gonnym (talk) 10:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- What about merging both Zeus#Genealogy of the Olympians and Hera#Genealogy with Template:Family of Zeus and Hera, and then keep it? This way, the merged template would not be unique at all (see my above comment). If this template is to be deleted, then this should be in a consistent nomination with numerous other equivalent templates? PPEMES (talk) 10:19, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah those two are identical trees. Merging is indeed a good option here. --Gonnym (talk) 19:08, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- What about merging both Zeus#Genealogy of the Olympians and Hera#Genealogy with Template:Family of Zeus and Hera, and then keep it? This way, the merged template would not be unique at all (see my above comment). If this template is to be deleted, then this should be in a consistent nomination with numerous other equivalent templates? PPEMES (talk) 10:19, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:28, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:28, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 02:12, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 May 4. Primefac (talk) 01:29, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Greek_myth_(Olympian) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Greek_mythology_(deities) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Module:Is rtl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Useless on the English Wikipedia; I already removed the usage in Module:Portal navigation. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:56, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Pppery: if this module is deleted will it break Module:Portal navigation? I needed Module:Portal navigation and it said this module was missing. John Cummings (talk) 14:03, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- @John Cummings: No, because I updated the module to not need this dependency, as I said in my nomination
I already removed the usage in Module:Portal navigation
. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:05, 24 April 2020 (UTC)- @Pppery:, ok, I don't really understand how these modules work so thanks for fixing it. John Cummings (talk) 14:06, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- @John Cummings: No, because I updated the module to not need this dependency, as I said in my nomination
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).