Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 January 18

< January 17	January 19 >

January 18 edit

Template:Oneus edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Oneus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough to justify a navbox. Only blue links are "related articles" cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 18:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 19:21, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 20:01, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 02:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Let them establish a career first. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 08:32, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Onewe edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Onewe (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough to justify a navbox. Only blue links are "related articles" cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 18:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 19:21, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 20:02, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 02:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Get notable content created first. WP:NENAN. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 08:37, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kings of the Two Sicilies edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Kings and Princes of the Two Sicilies and consider moving to a new (more inclusive) template name. Primefac (talk) 18:35, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kings of the Two Sicilies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The purpose of a navigation template is to link related articles, but all the articles except the list of monarchs are already linked through Template:Princes of the Two Sicilies, and it is not difficult to add the other link to that template. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:21, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I can see that the 4 kings appear in the princes template (although it is not immediately obvious - since the kings are not highlighted in any way), but if we delete the kings template doesn't the princes template have a confusing name? Is the plan to rename Template:Princes of the Two Sicilies to Template:Kings and Princes of the Two Sicilies (or whatever)? Nigej (talk) 17:38, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge both to a template with a better name as per Nigej. --Tom (LT) (talk) 02:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Quack Pack edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:13, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Quack Pack (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template for a short-lived show that only had one season. Only the article for the show itself is particularly relevant and not template creep. No separate articles exist for anything independently notable from this show in particular. Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 19:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 02:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).