Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 21

August 21 edit

Template:ARY Film Award Best Supporting Actor edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:27, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Single entry. Störm (talk) 23:04, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ARY Film Award Best Star Debut Male edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Single entry. Störm (talk) 23:04, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Please help edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Help me. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 19:10, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Please help with Template:Help me.
This template appears to serve the same purpose as {{Help me}}, except that it doesn't add the page to a category or provide any other kind of indication that the user is requesting help, making it unlikely to be seen. I think it might still be a useful redirect however. Oddly enough, all of the transclusions seemed to have been added before this template was even created. –Sonicwave talk 19:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Y I support Nokib Sarkar Poke 04:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support. The template is useless if it provides no metadata or anything. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  10:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Institute of Business Administration, Karachi edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Single entry, should be in see also section. No need for navbox. Störm (talk) 12:25, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cat priority edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 06:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Essentially a duplicate of {{Cat importance}}, this dates back to when a minority of WikiProjects used categories titled "Foo-priority bar articles" rather than "Foo-importance bar articles". This was all standardised back in 2011 though, so this template is now redundant and unused with only a single transclusion on an archived talk page. PC78 (talk) 00:46, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).