Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 March 24

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< March 23 March 25 >

March 24

edit

Template:Jeff Scott Soto

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:49, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links for a navbox. One EP and one compilation to his name, the rest of the links are just to associated acts. --woodensuperman 14:01, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 14:58, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 19:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2017–18 in Asian football (AFC)

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. No opposition. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 16:49, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same usage of Template:2017 in Asian football (AFC) and Template:2018 in Asian football (AFC) Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 04:39, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 05:25, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 19:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1957 in Japanese football

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 16:55, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Only 2 links in main box, do we need this Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 14:43, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 15:39, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Basketball color list

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:48, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused and broken, no "list" function in Module:Basketball color Frietjes (talk) 14:43, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:G1f2d

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by NinjaRobotPirate (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not an actual template. Given that its content is duplicated at Germán Franco Díaz, Wikipedia:Germán Franco Díaz, User:G1f2d, Talk:G1f2d/sandbox, and User:G1f2d/sandbox/Germán Franco Díaz, it's an attempt to spam Wikipedia. Calton | Talk 03:17, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Southern-California-geo-stub

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Moved to Cfd

The corresponding category is parent-only, containing county & regional sub-types, thus no stub template is needed to correspond to it. It is linked to only one article. ~Her Pegship~ 00:07, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

On the Templates for deletion page: "Stub templates and categories should be listed at Categories for discussion, as these templates are merely containers for their categories, unless the stub template does not come with a category and is being nominated by itself."
On the Categories for discussion page: "Categories for discussion (CfD) is where the renaming, merging or deletion of categories – i.e. pages in the Category namespace – is discussed and action decided. Stub types templates are also discussed here."
I am nominating the template by itself, but not the category, so it was not obvious to me which venue to choose. If you have a helpful suggestion as to how I should handle this error, please do so in a civil manner rather than simply pointing out that I'm wrong. This is not my first day editing, and I hope you will cut me some slack in this minor issue.
As for the lack of link in my signature, all I did was transclude the deletion code and, as directed, four tildes. If the link failed to appear, that is not due to any error on my part. ~Her Pegship~ 03:10, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Pegship, (1) click on the preferences link at the top of the page to access your preferences. (2) scroll down to the place where it shows your signature. (3) change it to something that links to either your user page or your talk page. otherwise, people have to scroll through the edit history to figure out how to contact you. and, yes per the instructions that you listed, stub templates are discussed at CFD, so this discussion should be closed as "wrong venue". Frietjes (talk) 19:12, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Pegship, and your pings don't work because your signature violates WP:SIGLINK. Frietjes (talk) 19:12, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_March_24&oldid=833620325"