Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 26

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< October 25 October 27 >

October 26

edit

Template:The Magic Circle - The David Devant Award

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fails 4/5 criteria of WP:NAVBOX - the award isn't mentioned in most of these biographies, the articles don't refer to one another, there isn't a Wikipedia article about the award (it's not even mentioned in The Magic Circle article) and the articles would not be linked by see-alsos. The navbox is also three years out of date. Gapfall (talk) 18:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 20:04, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox royal house

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox family. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 00:13, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox royal house with Template:Infobox family.
Completely redundant dublication of parametres, all collected inside Template:Infobox family. A merge would follow suit in the same way that the redundant Template:Noble house met a decision of merge with Template:Infobox family, as proposed here. Chicbyaccident (talk) 17:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 20:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Details

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Further information leaving a redirect and implementing the wording change as proposed. No opposition to merger. Primefac (talk) 00:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Details with Template:Further information.
While applying the terminology "for more information", rather than "for details" or "further information", for simplicity. Please note: unable to tag templates in question. Chicbyaccident (talk) 08:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Let's try to stay on-topic.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:33, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gujarati writers

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 November 3. Primefac (talk) 00:15, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Aurthohin

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nearly all the articles have been turned into redirects, rendering this Navbox rather useless. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Data Amsterdam

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 19:51, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

none of these data templates are used outside of userspace, and have generally been replaced by the {{Dutch municipality population}}, {{Dutch municipality total area}}, ... templates. the advantage of the population, total area, etc templates is that it's easier to update all the municipalities with one edit, rather than editing a bunch of individual templates. and, even then, the data table templates are generally being deprecated in favour of using wikidata for storing population and area data. Frietjes (talk) 18:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canton Cougars roster

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

team is defunct, the 2011 season roster is in the 2011 season article. Frietjes (talk) 17:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sainsbury's 20x20 Sustainability Plan

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, not clear where it would be used Frietjes (talk) 17:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Salvadoran presidential election, 2014

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates the table in Salvadoran presidential election, 2014#Results Frietjes (talk) 17:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Salgaocar

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Salgaocar F.C.. Primefac (talk) 00:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused fork of Template:Fb team Salgaocar Frietjes (talk) 17:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Saban general election, 2011

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, duplicates the table in Saban general election, 2011 Frietjes (talk) 17:22, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Data tag

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, no documentation, unclear purpose Frietjes (talk) 16:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Carolina Aviators roster

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

team folded, so there is no current roster Frietjes (talk) 15:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2012 UIFL Northern East Division standings

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:21, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, blank, wrong (Canton folded before the season) and duplicates Template:2012 UIFL Standings Frietjes (talk) 15:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2008 Italian general election in Veneto-Chamber of Deputies

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:21, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, duplicates Italian general election, 2008 (Veneto)#Results Frietjes (talk) 15:24, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2008 International League North standings

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:21, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates 2008 International League season#North Division Frietjes (talk) 15:19, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1998 Major League Soccer Eastern Conference table

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:24, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused and duplicates 1998 Major League Soccer season#Eastern_Conference, should be put to use or deleted. Frietjes (talk) 15:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CG Railway infobox

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; unnecessary duplication of {{CG Railway}}. Jc86035 (talk) 10:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support as uploader, this was being used for test purposes. --Natural RX 13:50, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chaebol

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. No opposition. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:25, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Following the report here, I looked into this template and found it highly problematic. It lists some Korean companies classified as 'Chaebol' but criteria for listing are unclear. It lists Top 10 but we don't have any top 10 list, Top 10 changes yearly. It lists 'others' and 'defunct', but those list are clearly incomplete as again we don't have any referenced list to base them on (linked Korean template has more entries but same problem of lack of sources). If we had a referenced list we could have a template listing Top 10 chebols by year or decade or such, but without a referenced list this template is pure and chaotic OR. In other words, this template may be omitting important entries, listing entities that should be on it, have major update-needed problems, and we have no way currently to verify any of this. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 03:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Eric Goldberg

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. No opposition. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 00:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links to warrant a navbox --woodensuperman 13:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 03:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Subst

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. A discussion regarding the exact wording of the template is encouraged based on the discussion, but not required. Primefac (talk) 00:27, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecate and convert to {{error}} - the listed functionality is already provided by the better known {{tls}}, and many transclusions are instead the result of users mistakenly trying to substitute something but using a pipe instead. Converting to an error would make it very easy to find these cases. – Train2104 (t • c) 15:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose When I accidentally use this it is good to get the result that I do. If it just says error, it will not be helpful. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Graeme Bartlett: I'm not suggesting that this be redirected to {{error}}, rather it be converted to a transclusion of it, with a helpful error message. – Train2104 (t • c) 01:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_October_26&oldid=1138373214"