Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 2

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< October 1 October 3 >

October 2 edit

Template:SHY48 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And here is number three, the third template for a sub-group of a band; it goes nowhere, and the sub-group's article is redirected. Drmies (talk) 22:46, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BEJ48 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another template that goes nowhere; article is now redirected. Drmies (talk) 22:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GNZ48 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a template that almost literally goes nowhere for a group with highly questionable notability. Drmies (talk) 22:38, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Steinmeier series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, all of the core links are section links. we have a TOC in the article for navigating between sections. Frietjes (talk) 14:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Echosmith edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 02:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Had several non-notable entries removed, now fails WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BRoy Sidebar-mini edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 10. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 06:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bicycling in Chicago edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 02:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template full of redlinks. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep, I reformatted it as a navbox and added it to some articles. Frietjes (talk) 14:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep now. There are several blue links and likely to be more. Many templates start off with more red links than blue - after time the red tends to disappear. Grutness...wha? 15:20, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the blue links. I am not sure we should include all the redlinks at this time.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:36, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Star Wars timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:StarTrekDS9 article edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, has been replaced by {{StarTrek.com link|DS9|...}}. Frietjes (talk) 14:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:St John Ambulance rank insignia England post-review edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. The information is already at St John Ambulance Ranks and Insignia. Primefac (talk) 15:09, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, not what template space is for Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eraserheads album tracks templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only 3 songs from each of these track list templates have their own articles, but all of them are already and more appropriately linked in the {{Eraserheads}} navbox. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ahnentafel4 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Ahnentafel-compact4. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 06:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Ahnentafel4 with Template:Ahnentafel-compact4.
Wikipedia:Family trees lists a lot of options, including Template:Chart for vertical presentation. For horizontal, there are several ahnentafel options, categorised inside Category:Ahnentafel formatting templates. Throughout biographical articles, clearly, the compact option seems to be the prevalent ones, more specifically Template:Ahnentafel-compact5. I do recognise that different options regarding number of generations are legitimate. However, I suppose a little bit of standardisation other than that could serve the readers more convienently. In case of an eventual merge, I would suggest retaining AhnentafelX as the final name (the more compact design being implicated). Chicbyaccident (talk) 12:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. We do not need multiple templates doing the same thing with only a slight variation. This is pretty much the same job as the old merge of all the myraid CompactToC templates (at least 8 of them).  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  02:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just a question: will this merging change anything in the presentation of Ahnentafel-compact4 ? --Dick Bos (talk) 18:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, not as far as this proposal is concerned. Chicbyaccident (talk) 21:48, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ahnentafel5 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Ahnentafel-compact5. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 06:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Ahnentafel5 with Template:Ahnentafel-compact5.
Please see above. Chicbyaccident (talk) 12:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. We do not need multiple templates doing the same thing with only a slight variation. Should actually merge these further to have just a single template for this with various parameters. The numbering system is all boogered, too, since several of these have been deleted.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  02:25, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
  • Comment what are the differences between the templates and which of those differences is it proposed to merge? -- PBS (talk) 15:13, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ahnentafel6 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Ahnentafel-compact6. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 06:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Ahnentafel6 with Template:Ahnentafel-compact6.
Please see above. Chicbyaccident (talk) 12:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. See my addl. comments in the other TfMs in this series.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  02:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BSOD edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough active links to be useful. --woodensuperman 09:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, no parent article. Frietjes (talk) 15:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, parent article and linked articles were deleted, no reason for template to remain. Lazz_R 23:00, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spanish Radio Stations in Delaware edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 10. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 06:06, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Urban War faction edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Harvard Residential House edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:12, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Table Melbourne top 20 birth countries edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, if needed, the content can be placed directly in the article. Frietjes (talk) 15:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_October_2&oldid=1138373239"