Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 November 16

November 16Edit

Template:H-1 auxEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 24 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lifeform-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Unused. We have well-established stub category trees such as Category:Eukaryote stubs to handle lifeforms. Until we make first contact, this is unnecessary. ~ Rob13Talk 19:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

DirecteursEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

redundant to navigation provided by Template:French Directory. if we really need the per-date-span chronology, we can add a "date span" option to Template:French Directory to toggle showing the particular "date span". Frietjes (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Baerum Basket depth chartEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

unused and out-of-date Frietjes (talk) 13:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Badmintonbox5Edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

unused Frietjes (talk) 13:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ba Football squadEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

unused and out-of-date Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

  • Keep, i will use it here Ba_F.C. and also update it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishfiji (talkcontribs) 06:43, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
    @Krishfiji: why would you do that when you can just update Ba F.C.#Current squad? there is no reason to have it in a separate template if you are just using it in one article. Frietjes (talk) 15:07, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete. Even if it is used, it would only be used in one article, so might as well be maintained on that article instead of in a template. ~ Rob13Talk 06:27, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cambrian navEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:33, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Unused and redundant to the graphically superior {{Cambrian graphical timeline}}. ~ Rob13Talk 11:36, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

This template is for categories, not articles, so there is no redundancy. Abyssal (talk) 12:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
It'll be used. Abyssal (talk) 19:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep: It's in use now. Abyssal (talk) 17:18, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
    • Yeah, but not usefully, in my opinion. It's being used to navigate to the categories that are already plainly linked on the page as subcategories. Where's the navigational benefit to that? ~ Rob13Talk 06:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CalifornicationEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Unused. Just a link to Californication, a character, and a bunch of links to the list of episodes article. Better handled by normal wikilinks. ~ Rob13Talk 11:35, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

  • delete, mostly redirects. Frietjes (talk) 13:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment I'm the author. All links were to articles at the time. I have removed [1] the entries which were deleted or redirected to List of Californication episodes. This should be done even if it's kept but it does leave a rather small navbox. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused Mid-American Conference standings templatesEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Unused. ~ Rob13Talk 11:30, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

  • delete, or move to userspace until the articles can be written. Frietjes (talk) 13:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1940s-jazz-composition-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn ~ Rob13Talk 19:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Unused. ~ Rob13Talk 11:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

  • Brand new template created as part of ongoing WPSS split of jazz stubs - not yet populated. Keep. Please check template history before nomination! Grutness...wha? 11:55, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep please, per Grutness' comment; I created it in September along with other upmerged decades templates, per the "to be created" page over at WPSS. Can we leave these there for musical stub sorters? Her Pegship (talk) 18:51, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1940s-erotic-novel-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Unused. ~ Rob13Talk 11:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1940s-child-sf-novel-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Unused. ~ Rob13Talk 11:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1940s-Marathi-film-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Unused. ~ Rob13Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1930s-jazz-composition-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn ~ Rob13Talk 19:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Unused. ~ Rob13Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

  • Brand new template created as part of ongoing WPSS split of jazz stubs - not yet populated. Keep. See above. Grutness...wha? 11:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep please, per Grutness' comment; I created it in September along with other upmerged decades templates, per the "to be created" page over at WPSS. Can we leave these there for musical stub sorters? Her Pegship (talk) 18:51, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1930s-horror-novel-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Unused. ~ Rob13Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1930s-Marathi-film-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Unused. ~ Rob13Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1920s-philos-novel-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Unused. ~ Rob13Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1920s-jazz-composition-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn ~ Rob13Talk 19:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Unused. ~ Rob13Talk 11:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

  • Brand new template created as part of ongoing WPSS split of jazz stubs - not yet populated. Keep. Again, see above. Grutness...wha? 11:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep please, per Grutness' comment; I created it in September along with other upmerged decades templates, per the "to be created" page over at WPSS. Can we leave these there for musical stub sorters? Her Pegship (talk) 18:52, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1920s-bildungsroman-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1920s-Marathi-film-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1910s-thriller-novel-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1910s-horror-novel-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1910s-erotic-novel-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1910s-child-hist-novel-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1900s-mystery-novel-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13Talk 11:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1900s-Germany-film-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13Talk 11:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1890s-child-hist-novel-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13Talk 11:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1880s-mystery-novel-stubEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Entirely unused and oddly specific stub template that's unlikely to ever accumulate enough stubs to make a category. ~ Rob13Talk 11:12, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).