Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 December 21

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 20 December 22 >

December 21 edit

Template:Footer European Champions 10km Open water swimming Women edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. BethNaught (talk) 17:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox that provides no assistance in navigation. Sole use is as a vanity embellishment on Sharon van Rouwendaal. Contrary to WP:NAV. Bazj (talk) 15:55, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Not enough links to provide useful navigation. --Rob Sinden (talk) 16:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - No need for a navbox with one navigational link. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 13:57, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Footer European Champions 25km Open water swimming Man edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox that provides no assistance in navigation. Sole use is as a vanity embellishment on Axel Reymond. Contrary to WP:NAV. Bazj (talk) 14:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the difference width Template:Footer European Champions 10km Open water swimming Women ? I don't understand... Ellessar1977 (talk) 16:00, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Not enough links to provide useful navigation. --Rob Sinden (talk) 16:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - No need for a navbox with one navigational link. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 14:08, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Culture (band) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template subject article deleted, individual member articles either redirect to band pages or link directly to unremarkable articles under discussion regarding notability. Abovethestorm (talk) 08:46, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ligue Régional I seasons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:32, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because none of the listed seasons are notable. As Spiderone said at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014–15 Ligue Régional I: way below professional level and so does not qualify to have season-specific articles. In the same Afd GiantSnowman suggested: bundle those related [season] articles into this AFD, they are also non-notable. The template will not be useful for navigation. Its existance may encourage recreation of non-notable articles. The two remaining seasons in the template are currently up for deletion here. --Bejnar (talk) 04:00, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - per nom. We don't want to encourage the articles to be recreated, as already stated. Spiderone 08:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not a useful aid to navigation given the current opinion on the notability of the constituent articles. Fenix down (talk) 16:26, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - simply not required. GiantSnowman 18:04, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - If none of the included seasons are notable, then there is absolutely no need for this template. We do not want to encourage recreation of recently deleted non-notable articles. — Jkudlick tcs 04:26, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note All the linked articles in the template have been deleted. --Bejnar (talk) 07:58, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:2016 ITF Women's Circuit edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 06:48, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TOOEARLY, most of infos aren't available now. 333-blue 12:21, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Circuit will start very soon, so WP:TOOEARLY does not apply.--Wolbo (talk) 12:17, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Userfy. This will eventually be useful, but it isn't right now. It serves no navigational purpose. ~ RobTalk 07:30, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It is almost 2016 and it will be useful soon. No point of deleting it for a week and then creating it again. Keroks (talk) 12:09, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:38, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Only three blue links. 333-blue 13:43, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SBN Luzon edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 05:06, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:38, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not enough station articles to sustain a navbox. Raymie (t • c) 05:54, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ciudad Victoria TV edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Dec 30. Primefac (talk) 07:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is only one article on which this template could be transcluded as the other links are all redirects to national network articles. Not enough local stations in Cd. Victoria for this to make sense. Raymie (t • c) 01:58, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ciudad Mante TV edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Dec 30. Primefac (talk) 07:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is only one article on which this template could be transcluded as the other links are all redirects to national network articles. It's not transcluded there, either. Raymie (t • c) 01:57, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:San Fernando TV edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Dec 30. Primefac (talk) 07:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are no local TV stations in San Fernando to use this template and only two stations in the area. No transclusions. Raymie (t • c) 01:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Soto la Marina TV edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Dec 30. Primefac (talk) 07:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are no local TV stations in Soto la Marina to use this template and only two stations in the area. No transclusions. Raymie (t • c) 01:55, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Villagran TV edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Dec 30. Primefac (talk) 07:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are no local TV stations in Villagrán, Tamps., to use this template, and only one station in the area. Raymie (t • c) 01:55, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_December_21&oldid=1079183371"