Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 March 22

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< March 21 March 23 >

March 22 edit


Template:Article 1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Article 1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, apparently created by error. GregorB (talk) 22:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox holiday camp edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:07, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox holiday camp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only 26 transactions. Redundant to {{Infobox park}}, to which any necessary parameters may be added. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:43, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Should have been 27 inclusions but one has recently been changed to an infobox place for reasons unknown and undiscussed. Further inclusions are possible as it has only been applied to former/current Butlins sites centerparc and other international resorts currently have no infoboxes. Disagree with merger to infobox park but grudgingly would support merger to infobox building due to its similarity with the former infobox hotel which was merged into building. An alternative proposal might be to merge this, infobox Disney resort, and an extracted infobox hotel into a holiday accomodation infobox perhaps infobox resort. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 18:33, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • This is absolutely not suitable for merging with {{Infobox building}}. These features are not buildings. (Note that the template is also used for some camps in the USA) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:04, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • Nor are these features parks, and some of the more densely packed ones bear more relation to an urban college campus than any definition of park. They do however form an overlap between larger hotels with an estate which are currently included as buildings despite not being so. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 19:44, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        • Google finds "About 2,720,000 results" for "holiday park" (with quotes). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:49, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
          • Most of which are open sites similar to the campsite or caravansite you list below with only a handful being similar to holiday camps in the traditional sense. Most traditional holiday camps now consider themselves closed site resorts and searches for variations on that term return 100x the number of hits which again points back to something like an Infobox resort for all holiday accomodation styles. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 22:52, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep or possibly merge with {{Infobox campground}}. Frietjes (talk) 17:05, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox campground edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:05, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox campground (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only 34 transclusions. Redundant to {{Infobox park}}, to which any required parameters may be added. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:27, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    • neutral as long as Infobox park is modified to add any needed parameters, I see no problem. The biggest problem is people not adding the infobox to existing articles. --evrik (talk) 15:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep, unless this is a merger proposal, in which case the other template should be tagged. Frietjes (talk) 19:30, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep  Not all parks are campgrounds, and not all campgrounds are parks.  Unscintillating (talk) 23:34, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: The only fields in this template, which are not replicated in {{Infobox park}}, are: |facilities=, |water=, |fee=, |fires=, |colors=, |mascot=. None are used widely. While all of these could be added to the park template, we can see from Ponderosa Campground, where we have |facilities=Vault Toilets, Picnic Tables, |water=Yes, |fee=$15/site/night, |fires=Yes, these are mostly crufty, and should not be used per WP:NOTDIR. I have yet to find an example of |colors= or |mascot= being used. Here's a sample conversion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:20, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NGruev edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 April 9 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:19, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Presidents Cup edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, replaced by Template:Infobox team golf tournament Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:03, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Presidents Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only ten transclusions. Unused Redundant to {{Infobox golf tournament}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Seve Trophy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, replaced by Template:Infobox team golf tournament Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:48, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Seve Trophy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only eight transclusions. Unused Redundant to {{Infobox golf tournament}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:31, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Fylkeskommune edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete, but some consensus to rewrite as a wrapper. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:40, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Fylkeskommune (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only twenty transclusions. Redundant to {{Infobox settlement}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • After seeing some of the articles on which it is used, I think that Template:Infobox government agency would be a better replacement.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 15:16, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep serves its relevant articles very well in a manner no other infoboxes can, with the relevant information being displayed. Not used in a settlement, so {{Infobox settlement}} would be directly misleading. An analysis of {{Infobox government agency}} does not show how it could display some of the relevant information, including ISO-code, administrative center, no. of schools/pupils and transit authority, possibly also others, which is key information for any county municipality. Arsenikk (talk) 21:50, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I created a wrapper for {{Infobox settlement}} in the sandbox. The testcase seems to be fine. I think they could be converted this way. This discussion does reaffirm the notion that the settlement infobox should be renamed to Infobox subdivision. CRwikiCA talk 22:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you. That shows that conversion is possible and that no data is lost. However, I don't think we need to keep it as a wrapper, long-term, with only 20 transclusions and no significant number of new Fylkeskommunes likely to be created. We should apply your code, then 'subst:' each instance. Here's an example substitution direct from the sandbox (note that if roads has no value cleanup is needed). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:55, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Now orphaned. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:20, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep as a wrapper (note you can find where it was orphaned here). Frietjes (talk) 18:09, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox F1 team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge --Jax 0677 (talk) 03:19, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox F1 team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox former F1 team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox F1 team with Template:Infobox former F1 team.
Redundant. Editors should not have to replace an infobox just because the subject has become inactive. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox british speedway team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:44, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox british speedway team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Infobox speedway team}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, redundant.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 15:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It isn't redundant. It has additional fields not found in Infobox speedway team. I don't know the history of how these developed but if having two infobox templates is really a problem (and I don't see why it is) then merging the two together and fixing the code so that it would display correctly without the additional values specified would be the way to go. --Michig (talk) 08:14, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • We generally take such parameters into account, when deleting a redundant template. This excellent essay explains why we delete them. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:46, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • Might be an idea to mention the need to merge when proposing deletion, as there was no indication that this had been spotted, and until the fields are merged it isn't redundant. --Michig (talk) 09:43, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • so, is this a merger proposal? Frietjes (talk) 19:28, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep if this is not a merger proposal, or relist as a merger proposal with details on what will be merged if it is a merger proposal. Frietjes (talk) 17:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Audio Bullys edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Audio Bullys (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails WP:NENAN, does not make the usual threshold of five relevant links (related items are usually not counted as relevant links) The Banner talk 11:22, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And changing "related" in "Other personnel" does not make the good man relevant. The Banner talk 17:59, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This template, discussed at TfD on June 8, 2013, remains largely unchanged and has enough articles linked by the navbox, including the article for George Lamb which mentions him managing Audio Bullys. Also, Back to Mine: Audio Bullys and "Only Man" have potential to become articles, which I would like to discuss here before splitting. --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:25, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - What I meant to say is, "has enough articles linked by the navbox, even without the article for George Lamb..." --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox PBA rivalry edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:04, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox PBA rivalry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use Redundant to {{Infobox sports rivalry}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 00:54, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Urban Music Awards Australia and New Zealand edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Urban Music Awards Australia and New Zealand (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (only 1 transclusion)
Template:Infobox Mnet Asian Music Awards (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (only 3 transclusions)

Propose merging Template:Infobox Urban Music Awards Australia and New Zealand with Template:Infobox Mnet Asian Music Awards.
Two low-use templates. Merge as a generic {{Infobox music awards}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 00:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge per nom.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 11:19, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't merge. I'm not overly concerned about this, however, these two awards ceremonies are completely different from each other. Why not nominate Urban Music Awards Australia and New Zealand template for deletion instead? DonEd (talk) 06:43, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • The issue is not whether the awards ceremonies are different to each other, but whether the templates need to be. With what would you replace the single-use template upon deletion, if a more-generic template is not made? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete both as redundant to {{infobox award}}. looks like one was orphaned here. replacing this with {{infobox award}} would have been a much better solution. Frietjes (talk) 18:15, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both and replace with {{Infobox award}} —PC-XT+ 05:36, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2014_March_22&oldid=1084289588"