Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 November 9

< November 8	November 10 >

November 9 edit

Template:Darren Ross edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Darren Ross (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is for a non-notable singer who's article is up for deletion and so this TFD is for housekeeping purposes so as not to have an orphaned template around. ArcAngel (talk) 11:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if all the relevant articles get deleted - which I imagine they will do - in which case this will serve no purpose. Guest9999 (talk) 19:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, are there any objections to me closing this then? ArcAngel (talk) 20:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TfDs are normally closed after seven days, not one, and not by the person who nominated the template for deletion. --RL0919 (talk) 20:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't normally work with TFD's, so I wasn't sure of the policy on them. Thanks for clarifying. ArcAngel (talk) 20:30, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There aren't really enough articles linked here for a good navbox even if the AfDs close as "keep", and the odds are that at least some of them will close as "delete". (Every article linked in the template is currently at AfD.) --RL0919 (talk) 20:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough articles to justify a navigational template. Robofish (talk) 01:11, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per RL0919. Not worth keeping even if the AfD is closed as Keep. GlassCobra 00:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Women's Cricketer edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Women's Cricketer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to Template:Infobox cricketer biography, no longer in use in main namespace. — AMBerry (talk) 01:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As nominator says, it is redundant to the other template which is in use for most articles (where infoboxes are present) in Category:Women cricketers. -SpacemanSpiff 01:38, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Redundant per nom Harrias (talk) 08:04, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ArcAngel (talk) 11:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unused and redundant to {{Infobox cricketer biography}}, which is widely used and more comprehensive. --RL0919 (talk) 14:30, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no remaining transclusions; deprecated in favour of Template:Infobox cricketer biography.—MDCollins (talk) 23:53, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Redundant per nom. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 05:29, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant. GlassCobra 00:06, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.