Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 November 8

< November 7	November 9 >

November 8 edit

Template:WWTBAM series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep with a note: if this template is not updated/expanded within 30 days time, the template can be relisted for deletion. JPG-GR (talk) 03:39, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WWTBAM series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Links a whopping three articles, each already linked sufficiently to the other. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:23, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. If the template were linked to more articles, it might be a keeper. ArcAngel (talk) 12:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - there is a problem navigating between these 3 articles, and this template resolves the problem. Kubek15^{T CS} 15:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Kubek15. DK4]]$4^(Contribs) 16:04, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a problem navigating among three articles, you seriously need help. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 18:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I meant: their titles are horribly long... Kubek15^{T CS} 20:39, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The answer is A: Keep, final answer, but try to expand the template.--It's my Junior year in High School! (talk) 21:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Chris[reply]

Expand with what? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 19:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Expand with more articles and related topics!--It's my Junior year in High School! (talk) 00:57, 12 November 2009 (UTC)Chris[reply]

Keep and expand. While this template only links four articles at the moment, one look at List of national variants in Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? shows there are many more that could be added. If all the national variants were included, there would be easily enough links to justify a navigational template. Robofish (talk) 01:10, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Director (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Consensus from this RfC was not to use these types of templates on pages of Actor and Filmmaker articles. Cirt (talk) 21:19, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per RFC. These awards don't need to be in a navbox. Garion96 (talk) 21:47, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per RFC. Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:13, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If the navboxes aren't going to be used in Actor and Filmmaker articles, then there is no need for them at all. Binksternet (talk) 00:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ArcAngel (talk) 11:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per RFC. LiteraryMaven (talk • contrib) 16:10, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Rossrs (talk) 12:34, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:US elections edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:US elections (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Subst and delete. This template, displaying about a dozen other navboxes as if it was like {{Navboxes}}, is currently only being used in one article. Zzyzx11 (talk) 17:00, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and replace the one use with {{Navboxes}}. The nominated template pre-dates {{Navboxes}}, and it appears that it just needs to be converted to use the generic template that is now available. --RL0919 (talk) 18:00, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.